Obamacare and your premiums.

[.blank cd]

So, you believe people who lose their medical insurance and have to spend more out of pocket for those costs, and then choose to work less so they can get more subsidies from the govt to pay for that hike in insurance costs.............are prosperous?

Thats what I asked if you believe, since that's what you typed.

We are already seeing it, the 40 hour work week is now 30 hours a week.

As it turned out, it was for no reason at all, since at the time they weren't burdened with any extra costs. They were caught lying. And, as it turned out, the hours cutting" and "wage reducing" was drastically less than pundits made it out to be, since the labor demands aren't reduced.

The CBO couldnt be even more clear

...and you're still trying to say something they didn't say.

[Vteckidd]

Thats what I asked if you believe, since that's what you typed.

your double talk even confuses me. I wont even address it because now im even lost as to what point you are trying to prove. The ACA is stripping families of choice, and inflating their costs. That is not HELPING them. That was MY point.

As it turned out, it was for no reason at all, since at the time they weren't burdened with any extra costs. They were caught lying. And, as it turned out, the hours cutting" and "wage reducing" was drastically less than pundits made it out to be, since the labor demands aren't reduced.

Businesses preparing for impending costs is "lying"?

Hours being cut was drastically less than what? EVER?



Do you completely ignore all economic data? So funny, they are adding more part time jobs than full time. That is exactly what the businesses said would happen. Then it does, then you accuse them of lying LOLOL

God it must be so nice living in complete ignorant bliss.

Despite the mostly favorable coverage of last week’s jobs report, the fine print of the report included the revelation that the number of Americans who want to work full time but could only find part-time work went up by 322,000. The number of part-time employees is now at an all-time high of more than 8.2 million. To put that number into perspective, that’s equal to the entire population of the state of Virginia. It appears that employers were already preparing for Obamacare by working to reduce the number of full-time employees they would have had to buy health-care insurance for. Maybe the White House knew for certain what the rest of us just suspected, or the administration had a sneak peek at the June data and realized that the need to delay the Obamacare employer mandate was urgent.

With the employer mandate delayed, the White House has bought itself a year — but what is it about a one-year delay that will make the choice for business any less obvious? A one-year delay won’t make employers’ choices any better or make them anymore likely to want to take actions that will be harmful to their businesses.

Bolded the parts you need to pay attention too. They didnt lie, they did exactly what they said they were going to do. Plus, part time work is at an all time high. How is that "drastically less" than the imaginary number you are comparing it too?

[Vteckidd]

Obama delayed the employer mandate BECAUSE he knows that the businesses WERENT lying.

Thanks for playing. Try again

[Sinfix_15]

every problem in america could be fixed almost instantly if the government actually wanted to. the government manufactures and maintains crisis. without crisis and division, 500 people wouldnt be able to control hundreds of millions.