
Originally Posted by
Vteckidd
beause like you said, the law protects GZ, the only crime really committed was TM assault. That was what was intiated.
Everything GZ did up until that point , was NOT criminal.
If GZ had NO attack marks, i think hes found guilty, IMO. The fact he could show he was attacked, and TM had no marks, and eyewitness saw TM punching, that is when the law protects GZ.