I did not say that. Once again, you do not pay attention and respond to the discussion, instead, you move to tangents.Originally Posted by .blank cd
Perhaps you should study up on the legal status before involving yourself in discussions that you apparently do not fully understand.
Start with the comments from Justice Antonin Scalia in District of Columbia v. Heller: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER
Scalia, June 26, 2008: Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time.” 307 U. S., at 179. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.”
Semi-autos are hardly considered unusual.
Reply With Quote