I gave you the list above. Its pretty clear in definition.
Since they already passed it once, and for 10 years - did it lead to a complete ban as you feared?
I gave you the list above. Its pretty clear in definition.
Since they already passed it once, and for 10 years - did it lead to a complete ban as you feared?
"Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting." - Steve McQueen
The modern day liberal is much worse than any who have sought to ban guns before them. King Obama has emboldened them. Feinsteins proposals are the biggest assault on the 2nd amendment in history and it has absolutely nothing to do with mass shootings or safety. This isnt "business as usual". This is the left making their run at the finish line. Liberals believe americans should be disarmed, the same way this president believes, despite what his teleprompter says.
I want you to re-read this statement and re-think it.
Feinstein was the author of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban which expired in 2004. Same liberal, so far, same legislation. I'm no fan of Feinstein or Pelosi, the facts do not agree with your speculation.
Obama has publically stated that he does not want to ban all guns. What evidence do you have to the contrary?
I personally do not want the ban on assault style weapons, but I do not believe that it is a complete ban on firearms. Registration of all firearms is a more slippery slope than assault style weapons.
"Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting." - Steve McQueen
Your random speculation with no basis in fact trumps what is publically stated by the person multiple times?
Your beliefs do not dictate his actions, so you need to produce evidence if you wish for your argument to be taken seriously, and not as a truther.
Your head is not in the sand - it's somewhere else.
"Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting." - Steve McQueen