Quote Originally Posted by David88vert View Post
You can shoot 11 rounds with a 10 round clip. You just have to reload the clip. It would simply take slightly more time.
I'm not sure how you figure than only having 10 rounds per clip with no limit on the amount of clips that you can have, nor a limit on guns suddenly makes America "gun free".

The difference between the assault style rifles and hunting rifles is simple:
Semi-automatic firearm models by name (e.g., Colt AR-15, TEC-9, non-select-fire AK-47s produced by three manufacturers, and Uzis) and other semi-automatic firearms because they possess a minimum set of cosmetic features from the following list of features:
Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following: Folding or telescoping stock, Pistol grip, Bayonet mount, Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one, Grenade launcher (more precisely, a muzzle device that enables launching or firing rifle grenades, though this applies only to muzzle mounted grenade launchers and not those mounted externally).

The Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 amended Section 921(a) of title 18 of the United States Code to define semiautomatic assault weapons and specifically named the following nineteen (19) semi-automatic firearm models and/or model types, as well as any copies or duplicates of these firearms, in any caliber, as assault weapons.
Norinco, Mitchell, and Poly Technologies AK-47 (all models)
Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI
Action Arms Israeli Military Industries Galil
Beretta AR-70 and
SC-70
Colt AR-15
Fabriqué National FN FAL
FN LAR and
FNC
MAC-type handguns, including MAC-10
MAC-11
MAC 11/9 and
MAC-12
Steyr AUG
INTRATEC TEC-9
TEC-DC9 and
TEC-22
Revolving cylinder shotguns, such as (or similar to) the Street Sweeper and Striker 12.
just because they dont take your freedom in 1 swoop does not mean theyre not trying to take it. You said it.... clip ban accomplishes nothing.... so why do it? A: because its a foot in the door. theyre not seeking the weapons that are most likely to put citizens in danger, theyre seeking the weapons most likely to put THEM in danger. The government should fear its people, not the other way around. Point to any example in history where handing over complete power to a government ever worked out for it's citizens? My guard is rightfully up because im being lied to by the most dishonest, secretive and sketchy president our country has ever known.