Quote Originally Posted by David88vert View Post
You have no clue as to the stupidity of what you type.
Again, you have no proof of a gene that impacts sexuality. That is fact, not conjecture. If/When it is proven that there is gay gene, then state that you have proof. Until then, you have nothing but your guess/opinion.
People do choose to be gay, that is fact, and is proven. So, what I have stated is factual, and you have claimed facts that do not currently exist.
Still stuck on the gay gene? Even after I've said and scientists said they havent found one yet? Lol. Let's break this down to a five year old level

Let's say instead of gay, we'll call them purple. You keep saying a purple gene doesn't exist. Scientists havent found it either, what they HAVE found, as I have shown you previously, are parts of genes that are blue, and parts of genes that are red, they've found some hormones that are very dark purple, almost black, they've found some hormones that are very light purple, almost white. MULTIPLE GENETIC FACTORS DOES NOT MEAN ONE SPECIFIC GAY GENE.

Make sense yet?

SCIENTIFIC FACT: Science has found genetic and hormonal factors that increase the likelihood of someone being gay. Homosexuality is NOT ALWAYS a choice. End of discussion

Anyone else need something broken down to a 5 year old level? Lol.