^ I disagree. I was watching a documentary on the study of sex and attraction. They described how pheromones come into play, how facial symmetry influences attraction, the significance of big breasts, ect...Basically it was saying how humans are programmed to find certain things attractive, in it's most primal state; a basic blue print for individuals to find a "perfect" mate to reproduce wIth. That really throws a wrench in the whole gays not having a choice theory. it seems that we are all wired by nature to find a mate of the opposite sex to reproduce the healthiest offspring possible. But something peculiar happens. Women who are considered very beautiful and desirable are choosing men who are the opposite. Like when you see that bomb shell blonde with the tall goofy awkward looking guy and you wonder how a guy like that managed to pull a girl like her. Surely she could have any man she wants, so why him? CHOICE! Maybe she was hurt and this guy is the "safe" choice. Maybe she is with him because he treats her good and makes her laugh...who knows. The fact is that she CHOSE that man and not the "best" candidate to reproduce with. It seems that we in our most primitive state of mind choose sexual partners based on what will be genetically probable for genes being passed on. Watch the video, it's pretty informative. It's called, The Science of Sex Appeal.

Many factors come into play when it comes to sexual attraction. But it all comes down to personal choice. If there ever was a gay gene, it would have been bred out through evolution. I also have a Biblical view, but that doesn't interest you guys, so here is the science approach.