Vteckidd: my friend, natures way of showing what is natural and perversion is the ability to reproduce. Atheist or Theist, we all no it to be true. Evolutionists would argue that a "homosexual gene" is not beneficial nor productive in any way shape or form. After all, the strong survive and pass on there traits. Homosexuals would have been phased out in the very beginning. And there is NO evidence what so ever to suggest that sexual orientation is genetic. As far as the guy you mentioned in your example, how do you know what his home life was like? I have two homosexual friends one a lesbian one gay. The guy Jayce was molested by his uncle for years, he grew up thinking it was normal, he now finds himself attracted to men. My lesbian friend Jackie was molested by her father, she now finds all men disgusting. Both these cases are examples of environmental influence. I am not pushing my beliefs on anyone. Marriage has ALWAYS been between men and women regardless of religious alliance. The gays come in and want to redefine it. How about this, we as a nation extend benefits to gay couples that have been together 5 years or more and have had a civil union. But they are not given a marriage license. Would that satisfy them? Are they after the equality to share the same benefits as a married couple(tax breaks, insurance benefits, ect) or are they poised at changing the way we as heterosexuals think?