I'm not trolling. For one thing, climate change data and interpretations have been manipulated more times than Pamela Anderson's tits. 40 years ago they said the earth is cooling because of us and we must stop it, now they say the earth is warming because of us and we must stop it. The data may support that there is warming, but where is the conclusive data that says it is anthropogenic and not merely another natural cycle? There's been climate variations long before we had planes, trains and automobiles. How far back does reliable climatological data go? 100-150 years? Maybe longer, even at a 1000 years that's a relatively minute sample. The earth has been around for how long? 4.5 billion give or take? Somehow we've managed to figure out the nuances of climate change from a sample set of 0.0000033333333333333333% of the age of the earth? Sounds reliable to me.Originally Posted by .blank cd
Care to comment on any other points from the video or is climate change it?
Reply With Quote