Quote Originally Posted by bu villain View Post
Actually it sounded like the argument was mostly over. You agreed man is affecting climate change and that your real concern was about how liberals use it to forward an agenda. Questioning political agenda is definitely valid as is questioning scientific findings with an actual scientific basis. But, questioning a scientific finding simply because it helps a political rival is not valid.

If we agree that the scientific finding is valid, we can move on the real issue which is what is the appropriate response. That is a discussion worth having.
I dont believe its valid on the scale that they want to advance the narrative, how about that. I have NOT seen any credible evidence that climate change IE mans existence has impacted NEGATIVELY the climate we live in. Alaska is still cold, hawaii is still hot. I think both sides can make an argument, but not an infallible one.

I also can concede that man probably has had SOME impact on the environment but to what extent we cannot possibly know conclusively. If youre asking me if man causes polution? sure. does pollution cause climate change? not conclusively. not IMO.