Not at all. Just that revenues are heavily more dependent on a functioning and healthy economy more than the rates at which all of those are taxed. The rates play a role, but, data included, with what I said it's clear that having a healthy, growing economy is going to do a lot more for tax revnues than the tax rates. I.e. 1948 and 2001 being the biggest revenue/gdp years in income were also ridiculously good years in the economy.
Not to mention the data I'm arguing about doesn't mention corporate taxes, which have been on the decline for 50 years. They're slowly and slowly loop-holing themselves out of existence. Remember, business don't pay taxes. They simply write Uncle Sam a check with your money.
___
So is it your position that you can take one point from the multitude of points and facts I've presented and dismiss everything you want and make the case that you're right and I'm wrong? Hyperbole doesn't make good argument.
Last edited by ek forever; 08-09-2011 at 06:28 PM.
Ok, just wanted be sure I understood what conclusion you were drawing from that graph.
No that's not my position. I never said you were wrong and never made a statement for me to be right about. I don't think every discussion needs to be about someone being right and others being wrong.