To those of you who said the healthcare bill isn't going to affect us

[David88vert]

that would be you my friend.

Actually, it seems that we are both wrong on one point. They don't have to get the insurance, and won't be fined.
"There are exceptions. Certain people with religious objections would not have to get health insurance. Nor would American Indians, illegal immigrants, or people in prison." - http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...-buy-insurance

http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/a...WS02/301099964

So your argument was moot from the initial statement.

[xxbckiexx]

Actually, it seems that we are both wrong on one point. They don't have to get the insurance, and won't be fined.
"There are exceptions. Certain people with religious objections would not have to get health insurance. Nor would American Indians, illegal immigrants, or people in prison." - http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...-buy-insurance

http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/a...WS02/301099964

So your argument was moot from the initial statement.

All that does is prove I'm correct. They had to write a stipulation in the bill so they wouldn't be taking certain peoples rights away, unconstitutionally. You said it wasn't, and would bear no impact.

[David88vert]

All that does is prove I'm correct. They had to write a stipulation in the bill so they wouldn't be taking certain peoples rights away, unconstitutionally. You said it wasn't, and would bear no impact.

You are wrong on that. You argued that the bill was unconstitutional as it was passed. You had no idea that it has a religious clause already in it.
They had that all the way back in the House bill. It was due to the current law requiring medical care for those mentally challenged, and children.