Quote Originally Posted by Vteckidd View Post
revisionist history.

We DID NOT GO TO WAR OVER WMD, WE DID NOT GO TO WAR OVER 9/11

We went to war because Saddam had defied the UN for 12 years and we KNEW he was giving safe harbor to Al-Qaeda. WMDs was a bonus, a bonus we never found.

Funny how back then everyone was for it. Do you agree with the War in afghanistan?

Look its simple, we were attacked, and we went after a country/dictator to
1) prove a point
2) establish a democratic state in a large muslim populated area (think domino effect)
3) Remove Saddam from power


Saddam and AlQaeda has also been disproven. Repeatedly.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Jun16.html

Quote Originally Posted by article
The staff report said that bin Laden "explored possible cooperation with Iraq" while in Sudan through 1996, but that "Iraq apparently never responded" to a bin Laden request for help in 1994. The commission cited reports of contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda after bin Laden went to Afghanistan in 1996, adding, "but they do not appear to have resulted in a collaborative relationship. Two senior bin Laden associates have adamantly denied that any ties existed between al Qaeda and Iraq. We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."
That article is from 2004, only a year after the invasion. So its not exactly revisionist history like the B/S you're spouting.

Keep stackin' bro. Your tower of babble is almost complete.