POLL: Obama - your take now?

[Hundo®]

The deficit that Reagan had was not due to the tax cuts that he pushed. It was due to defense spending, social programs, and the true worst recession since the Great Depression.

he doesn't see that. he only see's the information IN FRONT OF HIM. he refuses to dig deeper to see what the actual cause for the deficit was. tony is a surface dweller. he refuses to do any investigation other than what the democratic media will post for him to use as fuel.

[tony]

he doesn't see that. he only see's the information IN FRONT OF HIM. he refuses to dig deeper to see what the actual cause for the deficit was. tony is a surface dweller. he refuses to do any investigation other than what the democratic media will post for him to use as fuel.

Really? Because I understand that much of Reagan's deficit was due to his military spending, it is how he handled the cold war with Russia, his race to compete militarily and obviously it bankrupted the U.S.S.R, but I guess that is all common knowledge right?

That is all well and good but when you supplement that spending with tax cuts fundamentally the debt will rise. lol I don't even read liberal media, its as annoying as watching Faux news.. I read actual text.

[Hundo®]

Really? Because I understand that much of Reagan's deficit was due to his military spending, it is how he handled the cold war with Russia, his race to compete militarily and obviously it bankrupted the U.S.S.R, but I guess that is all common knowledge right?

ACTUALLY IT IS! It's learned upon us regular folk in scewl sistum, ya kno?

to add, i noticed the minute you had a rebuttal to something you dug up the previous post you made to prove your point (back to over a year ago!). But when bajjani asks you what possible positive this socialized health care could provide us, you tell him to "refer to your thread". Knowing full well he will not read pages upon pages trying to find where (if you even did) post what benefits proceed us. So please, enlighten us regular folk tony.

[tony]

ACTUALLY IT IS! It's learned upon us regular folk in scewl sistum, ya kno?

to add, i noticed the minute you had a rebuttal to something you dug up the previous post you made to prove your point (back to over a year ago!). But when bajjani asks you what possible positive this socialized health care could provide us, you tell him to "refer to your thread". Knowing full well he will not read pages upon pages trying to find where (if you even did) post what benefits proceed us. So please, enlighten us regular folk tony.

3 pages is pages upon pages? Find it yourselves, I get tired of posting the same thing over and over. Even in that thread I believe I was quoting myself from before. I'd probably do it if I knew the intent was to be objective rather than rebut whatever is posted.. I already wasted my time on that argument.

[Hundo®]

3 pages is pages upon pages? Find it yourselves, I get tired of posting the same thing over and over. Even in that thread I believe I was quoting myself from before. I'd probably do it if I knew the intent was to be objective rather than rebut whatever is posted.. I already wasted my time on that argument.

i didn't click your link either, because you already proved if you had a point, you'd post it. telling someone to find your point is another way of saying "i don't remember if i actually had one, but if i did, it'd be in there somewhere."