Quote Originally Posted by .blank cd View Post
LOL at people thinking Presidency has anything to do with this Peace Prize award! You do NOT have to be a sitting US President to qualify. You do not even have to be in public office to qualify! Stop saying "Because he was only in office so many days before the nomination, that he does not qualify" That sounds like you havent read anything about the prize itself. Achievements do not have to be made, but progress must be underway, which it is. NOBODY is even taking into account his efforts for a nuclear weapons free world

Mike, your analogy on heavyweight championship title is FAR from accurate
Man you totally miss the presidency point. Of course you dont have to be a president to win, no one said you had to be.

BUT HE DID NOTHING BEFORE HIS PRESIDENCY TO WIN A NOBEL PIECE PRIZE, WHAT DID HE DID HE DO IN 11 DAYS THAT:

Achievements do not have to be made, but progress must be underway, which it is
Stop the rhetoric, Tell me what he did in 11 days that made him worthy of winning, or tell me what he did PRIOR to his presidency that made him worthy of winning.

I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR YOUR ANSWER.

What he did after FEB 1st is well known, ive already stated it, hes done nothing. Unemployment, worse, war in iraq, still going on , war in afghanistam, worse, healthcare, not passed i could go on and on and on.

SOMEONE thought he was worthy of being nominated. If he should have been nominated BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT why wasnt he considered in 2006,2007? He was running for office those 2 years so he didnt do anything legislative.

Waiting.............