WND is just a smidgen above InfoWars and Stormfront as far as journalistic integrity goes. All of the above are pretty much the septic tank of the internet.![]()
"OMG EVIL CZARS"... you all know that the "czars" are really just cabinet directors with really long titles like "director of the dept. of ....." right? And you also know that the Russian monarchs were "Tsars," and communists were against the Tsars, right?
The use of the term "czars" in America was actually started by the press, because typing out long titles costs valuable space that could be used for advertising...
Tricky Dick had 2 "czars".
Jimmy Carter had 3.
Reagan: 1
Bill Clinton: 6
George W. Bush: 35 (so much for small government)
Obama: 31
source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...e_branch_czars
As far as Van Jones... bah. He attended a rally with some hippies. The same webpage that paints Van Jones as a radical commie also has a "9/11 was an inside job" article on it. Worthless bullshit. Reading that tripe was 30 seconds of my life I will never have back.
The czars are nothing like a cabinate member as they do not have any kind of congressional oversight.
They are accountable to the laws made by Congress and they also have to work with budgets appropriated by Congress. Congress makes the laws and these officials are responsible for their execution (hence the Executive branch). So explain how they are not subject to oversight.![]()