Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: FDA now regulates Big Tobacco?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    That T-Shirt Guy stillaneon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the land of the slow cars
    Age
    39
    Posts
    7,114
    Rep Power
    33

    Default FDA now regulates Big Tobacco?

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124474789599707175.html

    Quote Originally Posted by WSJ
    WASHINGTON -- The Senate overwhelmingly passed historic legislation Thursday that puts the tobacco industry under the regulation of the Food and Drug Administration.

    Companies are weighing the impact of the bill, which they say also puts severe, perhaps unconstitutional, restrictions on advertising and packaging. Those limits, they worry, could undo business plans based on smokeless tobacco products, which they have been developing in anticipation of this day.

    Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler, who spearheaded the original effort to treat the nicotine in tobacco as a drug, hailed the Senate vote of 79-17. "It's as strong a bill as we could have ever imagined," he said.

    He said the industry fees mandated by the bill to pay for FDA regulation will enable the regulator to strictly enforce new rules, such as a ban on candy- and fruit-flavored cigarettes. "With $600 [million] to $700 million from industry to support it, I think the administration can set it up."

    Critics said the bill will establish a new federal bureaucracy and unfairly benefit Philip Morris USA, a unit of Altria Group Inc., which dominates U.S. cigarette sales. Sen. Richard Burr (R., N.C.) said restrictions in the bill will hinder smaller companies from introducing new products.

    In a statement, Altria praised the legislation overall, saying it will require all tobacco makers to operate "at the same high standards." The company said, however, that it has First Amendment concerns about some advertising curbs. Industry officials said lawsuits could tie the legislation down.

    Since 1998, the industry has spent nearly $308 million in lobbying to block the bill. Cigarette makers have seen sales shrink in the past decade. They have been operating under some advertising restrictions that were part of their 1999 settlement with 46 states, led by Mississippi, which sued the companies for costs from tobacco-related deaths and illnesses.

    One key question is whether the bill's advertising restrictions will undo industry efforts to compensate for declining cigarette sales by moving aggressively into smokeless products. Several companies have begun developing snus -- spit-free smokeless tobacco in pouches -- and dissolvable tobacco pellets. Reynolds American Inc. is marketing Camel Snus nationwide, using the name of one of its best brands, and testing its Camel Orbs -- dissolvable tobacco pellets -- in limited markets.

    Philip Morris USA recently spent $10.3 billion to acquire the largest smokeless tobacco maker, UST Inc., known for brands like Copenhagen and Skoal. And, after some disappointing results with some early versions of snus and moist tobacco products, the company has introduced a new Marlboro Snus in limited markets.

    While controversial, some research shows that smokeless tobacco products may be less harmful because they generally contain fewer carcinogens than cigarettes and don't enter the lungs.

    Companies had hoped the bill would make it easier to advertise the lower risk of the smokeless products. But the new regulations still don't allow smokeless-tobacco makers to say their products are healthier unless they can prove that to the FDA.

    The regulations also require makers to pull from the market products that were introduced after February 2007, which could hurt some dissolvable tobacco pellets and strips. Some snus products will likely be exempt because similar pouches were on sale before that date.

    This bill "could significantly chill the introduction or commercialization of new tobacco products that have significantly lower risks than cigarettes," said Tommy Payne, a Reynolds spokesman.

    The new ban on candy- and fruit-flavored cigarettes isn't expected to have a big financial impact. Menthol cigarettes are initially exempt from the ban because of demands from the Congressional Black Caucus. About 75% of African-American smokers buy menthol brands.

    The FDA is required to set up an advisory panel that will report within a year on whether menthol should be banned.

    The FDA has to begin hiring scientists and reviewers who can deal with tobacco issues, and must name the head of the new tobacco division. One potential candidate is current Deputy Secretary for Health and Human Services Bill Corr, who was previously the lobbyist for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. FDA Deputy Commissioner Joshua Sharfstein was a proponent of the bill and worked on antitobacco issues for Rep. Henry Waxman (D., Calif.), the legislation's lead sponsor in the House.

    There was a note of sadness during the Senate roll call because the bill's lead sponsor, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D., Mass.), is gravely ill and couldn't come to the Senate to vote.
    I'm just that guy that spends all his time printing.... T-shirts, banners, vinyl, etc.

    "Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary.... that's what gets you"

  2. #2
    ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ RandomGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    18,981
    Rep Power
    150

    Default

    The new ban on candy- and fruit-flavored cigarettes isn't expected to have a big financial impact. Menthol cigarettes are initially exempt from the ban because of demands from the Congressional Black Caucus. About 75% of African-American smokers buy menthol brands.
    LOL

    no more grape swishers and potes

  3. #3
    Certified Gearhead F8d2Blk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    48
    Posts
    561
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Seems as if the government is about to own everything. Whats next? When is enough, enough?

  4. #4
    The Gradies... eraser4g63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Canton
    Age
    40
    Posts
    2,325
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Dont forget the Government always knows what is best for you.....
    Try not. Do or Do not.

  5. #5
    ( . )( . ) inmymouth _Christian_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Dunwoody/Sandy Springs
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,631
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eraser4g63
    Dont forget the Government always knows what is best for you.....
    Of course..


  6. #6
    D0 W3RK RedEj8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Macon
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1,566
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Welcome to Socialism, comrades.

  7. #7
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    I dont think the gov't has the right to govern the tobacco industry, but i will say it wouldnt hurt my feelings to not have to smell any more smoke or see dip spit again.

  8. #8
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    retarded, if i want to smoke and die of cancer let me do it in peace.

    I agree they should be allowed and market cigarettes to children and sell them to kids underage. I have no problem with that. But if i want a smoke grap flavored cigs at 18 years old, FUCK OFF.

    What is so god damn funny is they will keep running Mohito, Bacardi, Dos Equis ads i bet. Lets face it alcohol is just as bad as cigarettes but they are allowed TV advertising.

    Go to any highschool right now or college, underage drinking is a huge problem
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  9. #9
    Moderator BanginJimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hiram, GA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,499
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vteckidd
    retarded, if i want to smoke and die of cancer let me do it in peace.

    I agree they should be allowed and market cigarettes to children and sell them to kids underage. I have no problem with that. But if i want a smoke grap flavored cigs at 18 years old, FUCK OFF.

    What is so god damn funny is they will keep running Mohito, Bacardi, Dos Equis ads i bet. Lets face it alcohol is just as bad as cigarettes but they are allowed TV advertising.

    Go to any highschool right now or college, underage drinking is a huge problem

    The health costs incurred by smokers has a very real impact on everyone else though. Legislation needs to be passed that would allow a smoker to be denied, or pay an additional smokers fee by their insurance company. Maybe if a smoker pays an extra $15 a week for their insurance it will help to reduce the costs for some of us.

  10. #10
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BanginJimmy
    The health costs incurred by smokers has a very real impact on everyone else though. Legislation needs to be passed that would allow a smoker to be denied, or pay an additional smokers fee by their insurance company. Maybe if a smoker pays an extra $15 a week for their insurance it will help to reduce the costs for some of us.
    respectfully.....bullshit. Smokers pay more for health insurance already. My policy went from $125 to $177 a month because I smoke.

    It's just like car insurance if you are abigger risk you pay more.
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  11. #11
    Moderator BanginJimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hiram, GA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,499
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vteckidd
    respectfully.....bullshit. Smokers pay more for health insurance already. My policy went from $125 to $177 a month because I smoke.

    It's just like car insurance if you are abigger risk you pay more.
    Are you self insured or through a group plan though? As far as I know there is no health assessments in a group plan such as through a company. I know that none of the plans I have been part of have asked any type of health questions before I was covered.

  12. #12
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BanginJimmy
    Are you self insured or through a group plan though? As far as I know there is no health assessments in a group plan such as through a company. I know that none of the plans I have been part of have asked any type of health questions before I was covered.
    I've seen several life insurance companies do swab tests for tobacco usage, me included. I'm not sure about health insurance though...

    I see no reason why the FDA would not regulate anything a person intakes.

  13. #13
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BanginJimmy
    Are you self insured or through a group plan though? As far as I know there is no health assessments in a group plan such as through a company. I know that none of the plans I have been part of have asked any type of health questions before I was covered.
    ahh I apolagize then I am self insured.
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  14. #14
    Im French! Frög's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    AMERICA FUCK YEAH
    Posts
    8,134
    Rep Power
    33

    Default

    Cigarettes & alcohol are way worst than pot..

    I got ninja'ed
    Last edited by Frög; 06-14-2009 at 01:01 PM.

  15. #15
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Yeah except for the fact that insurance isn't based on one person, its pooled risk.

  16. #16
    PEENGONE Hektik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    ( +[__]:: ) PLAYING IN TRAFFIC
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,244
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    "America Fuckyea"

    lol but seriously. I have no problem with the FDA having a look at what cigarette companies are putting into my cigarettes. It just makes it a little easier for me to kill myself with cancer and blame it on the government...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!