Quote Originally Posted by tippatone
When did the attacks take place under Bush's watch. He ignored intel that was given to him, you feel safer, or is the media making you feel safe?

What intel did he ignore? I know you dont mean the very vague intel that said the US might be attacked using airplanes. That isnt enough for a single city to act on, not to mention an entire country. There was no mention of timeline, cities, number of planes. You should also drop this on Clinton. He had the same info that Bush had and did nothing with it. The terrorists came into the country under Clintons watch. The planning was done under Clinton's watch.

By your standards you should most definitely agree with the invasion of Iraq. The intel we used to go there was FAR stronger than what we had before 9/11.

I know the US is safer because the US hasnt been successfully attacked in 8 years. Name another president since Nixon that can make that same claim.