*sigh*....ok man. you're right, we've ALWAYS been in debt (prior to bush). let's use your "choice" word SUPPOSEDLY, and pretend as if it were real. the point is....HE LEFT OVER A $10T DEBT, HIGHEST RATE OF FORECLOSURES (since who knows when), HIGHEST RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT (in like 20yrs), AND CONTINUED TO SPEND $12B PER MONTH IN IRAQ (a country that DIDN'T even attack us).Originally Posted by SL65AMG
that's a huge difference than ASSUMING obama is going to leave us with a $9.3T debt after 60 days. SHAME ON OBAMA FOR SPENDING BILLIONS ALREADY TO TRY TO DIG US OUT OF THIS MESS! who does he think he is...a president that received an economically destroyed country!?!
lol, i can't believe some of you are putting so much value on a PREDICTION. i'm sure someone is going to come in here and talk about "it's not bush" fault, clinton left the housing bubble." give me a break...dude had 8yrs to find and rectify that shit...and he did absolutely nothing but spend spend spend, and reduce taxes. that's like quitting your job and going on a shopping spree.
before i do the math, how about you do a little bit of research on FACTS. i'd hate for you to start freaking out when someone writes an article about "obama might have dinner with the klingons."




Reply With Quote