
Originally Posted by
BanginJimmy
Well the UN has proven to be a complete failure. The US could save a few billion a year in dues and ahve a ncie pience of property in Manhattan to sell if we kicked them out.
More on point though, Iraq had been ignoring UN resolutions for a decade and we were justified in removing Sadaam 8 years before we did. The problem was that the security council had 4 permanent members who played a alrge role and profitted heavily from oil for food. These were also countriens that sold them weapons in violation of their own resolutions.
I agree here. It was in the US's intrest to put someone friendly in Iraq to help secure oil at a reasonable price while at the same time creating a buffer between Iran and the Kingdom.
Terrorists did not operate or seek sanctuary in Iraq, but they did receive massive amounts of funding from Iraq. These were not groups that were anti american though. These were groups that operated out of Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria and attacked Israel.