So you've never heard McCain use the term Laissez Faire?Originally Posted by willum14pb
agreed, however, mccain (and believe it or not) the bush administration presented 2 different bills to start regulation. Nothing was done, but at least they saw it coming. Unlike obama who was taking loans.
the governments involvement in those companies is what led to them going out of control int he first place. Why dont you read the community reinvestment act. At the point it was at, it was obvious there was a subsequent meltdown upon us, so then and there it was realized something needed to be done. Had it not been for clintons changes to the CRA we wouldn't be where we are now.
Now you're confusing me, is it Regulation or isn't it?
agreed, however, mccain (and believe it or not) the bush administration presented 2 different bills to start regulation. Nothing was done, but at least they saw it coming
you DO realize that there is different types of involvement. Please don't act ignorant. Now you're just playing ring around teh rosie because you have nothing else to go off of. Im done.
Regulation IS involvement. McCain supposedly called for Regulation but believed in a Laissez Faire approach which he said it himself. He was FOR deregulation, and Republicans naturally are. Theres no ring around the rosie, you just do not know what you are talking about. Everything is partisan to you and that is where your logic is flawed, McCain can do no wrong in your eyes.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
