Originally Posted by BanginJimmy
pretty minor? GOP made and still make the biggest deal about clinton getting his groove on and then lying about it. i think firing someone for not doing your dirty work is a worse offense then watching your aid masturbate w/ a cigar
Still not proven sorry.pretty minor? GOP made and still make the biggest deal about clinton getting his groove on and then lying about it. i think firing someone for not doing your dirty work is a worse offense then watching your aid masturbate w/ a cigar
Couple of things
1) Investigation was done by a purely political regime, mostly made up of Obama Supporters
2) Clinton was impeached by BOTH SIDES, not just the opposite party.
3) CLinton LIED UNDER OATH, Palin has no
4) THere still is NO LINK to her firing the guy PURELY because he wouldnt fire her brother in law
5) She didnt break the law, Clinton did, he lied under oath aka perjury
The guy she wanted fired, besides being her brother in law, is on the record as drinking on the job, tasering his 10 year old son, etc etc etc. If she didnt fire him, it would have looked bad.
HMMMMMM wonder why her sister wanted to leave him
i see no abuse of power. ANd if you think it was an abuse of power, then i strongly want to see your opinion on Clinton pardoning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Cl...ns_controversy
Which included his BROTHER and Susan Mcdougal
Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
-www.usedbarcode.net
actually it was proven her own husband had to testify and now she could be impeached b/c she broke alaska ethics laws. she didn't break laws in firing b/c she can legally fire who she wants but dismissing employees over personal gain is part of ethics which is where she fails.
her own husband had talks w/ guy she fired in the governors office... doesn't matter we all knew she was whack job. woman runs around on how she sold the plane yet she charged alaska for more then 325,000 in travel to her own home. yes she charged alaska money for her to stay in her own home. sure sounds like gov't on the side of the people
LOL this is such a 1 sided post i cant even comment on it.actually it was proven her own husband had to testify and now she could be impeached b/c she broke alaska ethics laws. she didn't break laws in firing b/c she can legally fire who she wants but dismissing employees over personal gain is part of ethics which is where she fails.
her own husband had talks w/ guy she fired in the governors office... doesn't matter we all knew she was whack job. woman runs around on how she sold the plane yet she charged alaska for more then 325,000 in travel to her own home. yes she charged alaska money for her to stay in her own home. sure sounds like gov't on the side of the people
What did she gain from firing this guy? personal gain? what do you mean? shes governor, no one moves up or down when she fired that guy. She wanted her brother in law fired for deriliction of duty, someone refused to do it, she fired him.
She will NOT be impeached she did nothing wrong, what part dont you get?
All her travel expenses have been cleared, especially since the AVERAGE official uses over $500,000-1 million in travelling expenses, i think shes within her budget
Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
-www.usedbarcode.net
obviously you don't know enough on this subject to comment b/c she can be impeached b/c she swore an oath much like clinton which has ethics laws that spell this out. there was much to gain in firing her sisters ex... hmm let me think. satisfaction.
again you obviously didn't understand - when she went home to stay in her personal home she charged alaska tax payers like she was held up in some hotel... this total was 325,000$... how much does it cost you to stay in your own home mike?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote