Funny, I looked and couldnt find the breakdown of Obama or Biden. Can you post a link to those?
Funny, I looked and couldnt find the breakdown of Obama or Biden. Can you post a link to those?
you probably won't b/c they aren't running direct contradictions for their campaign. i'm not going to say they haven't made any but they haven't based their campaign on them; also considering some are direct conflict w/ your running mates stance on subjects.Originally Posted by BanginJimmy
mccain - earmarks = palinFTL
you probably won't b/c they aren't running direct contradictions for their campaign. i'm not going to say they haven't made any but they haven't based their campaign on them; also considering some are direct conflict w/ your running mates stance on subjects.
mccain - earmarks = palin
Sort of like when Biden vote FOR war in Iraq.
Obama is for change, yet has one of the longest serving Senators and well known Washington insider is picked as his VP.
Both of those are direct condradictions to the basis of Obama's campaign.
In other words, Rolling Stone is only going to continue the MSM's blatant support for Obama and do all they can to attack the Republican ticket.
again you missed my point... when you say you are not for specific policy yet you are that is a contradiction. your opinion on obama running on "change" slogan is exactly that opinion. there is a distinct difference.
So that fact that Obama's entire campaign has been based soleonly on mantra of change and all of his postser say that, but when I say it, is just just my opinion? I dont see that "distinct difference".
is he different then bush? does he agree with bush policies? ok no need to discuss further.
No he doesnt agree with Bush. But how about we look at his views when put up against those of Karl Marx. I'll bet you find quite a few more similarities.
i don't even understand this statement. in the debate, when biden was asked what he would change in obama's plan if he had to become president...do you remember what the man said? he said he'd continue running obama's plans/policies. the idea behind picking him was to have a "well known washington insider" to support his fundamentaly different strategies. did you also hear when biden said "obama wants me to be there during every single discussion." having someone with far more experience than you, to guide with the employment of "NEW AGE" ideas is change.
obama may share SOME views/ideas with karl marx....by NOT employing ALL marxist ideas and ALL capitalist ideas is still CHANGE, no matter how you flip it.
I didnt get to watch the hole debate. but what i did see was Palin giggling and smiling for the camera. she is pretty much a tool to target middle age moms, Trailer Trash women, and Lonely ol red neck men.
she has no clue what she is doing. NONE! how can some one go from running a small VILLAGE to helping run a country? she needs some more years under her belt.
though Oboma has no clue either. but like you stated. Biden is an insider, he knows how things work.
ALSO A NOTE
I am still unsure of whom i will be voting for. both party have ideas and planes i like. but who is going to follow through is my only question. i may do like i did last time. VOTE NADOR. atleast then i can i still voted.
www.street-706.tklets compare bush to jesus i mean they are like best friends
Take someone who doesn't have a clue as you said and put them at the starting line of a campaign to end up going against Hillary Clinton at the end, lets see how far they get.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote