I think you misinterpreted.

Its not free from bias, though not as biased as many other readings. I'm not saying its not a good read, nor am I saying that the facts are disputable, but that is is biased, that is all. I agree with most of it, and find it a very good read, actually had me chuckling.

Can you really claim this to be unbiased? I mean honestly.


EDIT: Yes, I'm retarded, but only because if I'm not, then you are for concluding I am.