Quote Originally Posted by admin
obviously the point you missed is they are talking about mccains body language during the debate; it wasn't engaging w/ obama which leads some people to believe he is full of sh!t. obviously many people including obama felt that way b/c he had to correct "john" numerous times.

no being able to look someone in the eye is seen as a weakness of character.

(i'm not supporting any statements just clarifing what i'm reading in here)

honestly i think mccain just has poor body language this is one reason he needs someone like palin; he is our grandfathers' age and is more worried about nap time then exciting people.
From what I saw there was no significant differences in body language between the two to actually care about it. McCain wasn't doing anything to disrespect Obama in any way, and Obama wasn't either. I didn't see anything done by either of them regarding body language or how they adressed each other that deserved any criticism. This is like someone bitching about Obama calling him "John." He's not looking to excite people, he speaks in a factual (and rather dull) manner. You're right about why he needs Palin, too bad she's too stupid to actually help him out. He obviously doesn't have the speaking charisma that Obama has but using that to say he's "full of ****" is a stupid argument imo.