
- Bailout question...
-
this is the real world. they wont cut back on their settlements, they cant.
even though its right,
you cant save the middle income even though they deserve it.
but what you can do it alter minimal aid in order to create a butterfly effect,
changing outside markets in the distance, attracting foreign investors again and creating a stronger foundation for the near future.
this administration is very unpopular and probably the same people who voted for bush, will vote bush again in the next election. its like a bulldog vs tech syndrome for these states. some of them never even went to college but roots for them for no reason just by their influences around and swears by them.
i was sad to see clinton leave, like i didnt want him to leave, even though he was almost impeached at the end, i didnt care for that. i cared for the money i was making and everybody was having a fun orgy.
even the rich was happy, mind you.
but the rich they were happier, when they saw the next bush was going to lower their high income taxes, and well the rest was happy to see them get to buy their hunting licenses easier.
$700 billion is alot. there is alot of other options they can do with $700 billion dollars but at whose highest interest?
that money can buy out peoples foreclose home loans, built bio energy investments, funding other inhouse ROI to increase foreign investors to come back in.. etc.
i went to school for economics and from a theoretical standpoint, its a very viable option and sounds great, but the reality is we are not dealing with robots or saints... we are dealing with locust infested greed and panic and international cultures reacting in the near future.
this may boost up the economy in wall street and other international markets but i cant say how long. this is because of the nature of the boost.
all we can do is hope for the best, but i seriously think its boost is temporary and i think $700 billion dollars should be considered investing else where.
the main reason is because economic plans are not facts and the variables are never stagnant.
our $700 bailout has to be rock solid! so other investors can see it and churn the locomotive again. a no brainier plan is the best plan for investors. a fickle plan like they propose leads very fickle investors to hang on longer.
them going back and forth about pulling the trigger shows a sign of weakness, and uncertainty... IF THE STOCKS FALL A WEEK AFTER.... chaos will come again, this time thru out the globe.
Last edited by v-empire; 09-25-2008 at 04:17 PM.

- Bailout question...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules