Originally Posted by Mr. KiDD
Now lets stop being stupid and spreading lies.
Mccain is for giving the people that PAY THE MOST TAXES THE BIGGEST BREAK. That means, the "rich" in your terms get the most benefit.
Lets think about that LOGICALLY.
The people that PAY THE MOST get the MOST BREAK. So people paying $40,000-100,000+ in TAXES get MORE MONEY BACK than the guy paying $2000-10,000. NO WAY , THATS INSANE HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN?
MATH DUMBASSES.
I hate this liberal bullsh!t of "Mccains tax policy means the RICH GET RICHER!!!"
NO ****, they SPEND THE MOST, THEY PAY THE MOST and the keep the ECONOMY GOING.
Obama wants to TAX THE SH!T out of the RICH to give to the poor. SOrry thats stupid, and as carter proved, the totally WRONG THING TO DO when you are near a recession.
And oh by the way, the middle class under BOTH CANDIDATES will get MORE MONEY BACK, Obama just wants to skew it even more.
Problem with Obama is, sure anyone under $200,000 will get a BIG BREAK, but he will go after the small business people and raise the capital gains taxes.
So the people that think hes championing the little people, youre STUPID. WHO DO YOU THINK THE MAJORITY OF THE $80k-200k people are? SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS!!!!!!
How can you sit here and say that taking the money from the people that are keeping this country GROWING and making the economy GROW should have even more money taken away to give to the blue collar guy?
The blue Collar guy is important to take care of, and Under mccain he would get more money back than he does now. but under Obama it will be at the risk of losing EVEN MORE JOBS OVERSEAS AS IT GETS UNBEARABLE TO MAKE ANY KIND OF MONEY OVER $200,000 to do with the tax bracket you will be in.
Makes tons of sense
CNNmoney.com CLEARLY SAYS:
"...Under both plans, all American taxpayers could pay a price for their tax cuts: a bigger deficit. The Tax Policy Center estimates that over 10 years, McCain's tax proposals could increase the national debt by as much as $4.5 trillion with interest, while Obama's could add as much as $3.3 trillion..."
^^^that's the most import part of the whole ARTICLE/RANT. if we were to follow your ideology that the "rich support the economy" then, how would giving them back more money make our economy any better? clearly, there's far less for our economy to lose under obama as opposed to mccain. you're probably thinking "well it's only a difference of $1.2 trillion!?!" well count to 1 trillion and see how much it REALLY is.
let's compare this graph with yours. under obama, the people who make less than 111k put the most money back in their pockets. now let's add up the percentage of the population that is from my graph...80% for households (up to 100k), and 93% per individual. so you mean to tell me that 7% of the population is what keeps this economy afloat?
and you can't even use the argument that the more small businesses have to pay, the harder it is for them to live and afford to run their business. so now instead of bringing home $2.9 million a year, you now only bring $2.2...or instead of $700k you're bringing home $600k...SOUND THE ALARM! CANCEL THE LOBSTER! RETURN THE LAMBO! CLOSE THE BUSINESS (that's probably financially supporting itself)!
let's add an additional $4.5 trillion to our deficit (not to mention the interest on that), and see how that affects the amount of money in our top 5%...that's what it's all about, right?
"YOU CAN PUT LIPSTICK ON A PIG...BUT IT'S STILL A PIG!" HAHAHA!
Reply With Quote