ATTN: Brittney. I found your next car.

[AFSil80]

CA's don't rev as high as an SR. The rev limiter hits at 7200 stock compared with 7500 on an SR.

Last time I checked, the CA redline was 7600.

SR's have a better head design but the CA has a better block and slightly better valvetrain. So what, we have rocker arm stoppers? Doesn't mean the valvetrain sucks.

SR = 1 lobe per 2 valves, CA = 1 lobe per valve. The rocker arms have often been claimed as the weakest part of the SR, from some incidents that I've read, I've decided I'd rather use my money on more parts than preventative maintenance.

The reason the SR's are the band wagon now is because bang for your buck, parts avaliability,newer, more potential for big power and so on.

CA's are very potent, parts aren't insanely hard to come by like people make them out to be. Yes, I know the age is a real hard hitter in the CA, and that a rebuild should be performed before installing the motor.

Toyota uses 3sgte's in their race car's does that make 2j's suck?

And that's just comparing apples to oranges. You can't say that the CA is to the SR like the 3S is to the 2J. We're comparing 2 4 cyl turbos to each other, not a 4 cyl turbo to a 6 cyl twin.

If you wanna compare like that, then we'd have to talk about the differences between the CA and the RB...only difference I can think of, is the CA's lack of 2 cylinders...everything else in the CA is based of the RB's design as well...

So once again, I think the CA has a better overall design than the SR...

But that's my opinion, and I won't sway from it, and I can see you won't sway from yours (not that I'm trying to get you to).