Originally Posted by namahs
Which is obviously your opinion.
Fact: Mitsu cars are less reliable as a whole.
Here is a more reliable interpretation of how both cars handle on the track:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...ighlight=track
And the last Atlanta region Solo-II where the two EVO's were slower than the three STi's (moreso driver and setup differences tho):
http://lists.carlc.com/pipermail/sol...ch/012873.html
In a nutshell, both cars will handle the same to most people out there. If you have track experience, you will be able to tell the difference, which is very minimal. Start modding the suspension and that difference is even harder to distinguish.
I do like the EVO, don't get me wrong, I just didn't get one because the lack of dealer "support" and the reliability issues the company has been plauged with forever.
Did I mention that Subaru of Gwinnett has an AWD dyno and tunes cars there? They even flash the ecu. Rick Case would have a heart attack if that were his place. lol
Also, I have 20k miles on my car, it's been tracked and auto-x'd and it doesn't "consume" any oil at all. Don't believe the hype.
Oh and I still consider myself a Honda guy that just drives a Subaru at this time.
If you can't find the deal you want, check the internet. I bought mine from a dealer in Jacksonville because none of the ATL dealers wanted to "deal" back in 03. I got mine for $500 over invoice, which at the time was great.
