yes, letsOriginally Posted by bigdare23
ok UF played LSU, Auburn, Tenn good teams
USC playd/will play Oregon, Cal, ND, Nebraska, Ark good teams
yes, letsOriginally Posted by bigdare23
ok UF played LSU, Auburn, Tenn good teams
USC playd/will play Oregon, Cal, ND, Nebraska, Ark good teams
Val for President
UF's only loss was to Auburn.
USC's only loss was to Oregon State...
Meh.
I'd rank UF above USC.
uh how does that prove their schedule harder when UF plays all those teams as well?Originally Posted by HalfBaked
![]()
USC.Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
Southern Cal.
they got dominated by USC
so if your gonna say ark is better than UF how can you EVER say UF is better than USC, doesnt make much sense![]()
cmon matt, i know your smarter than that USC>ARK>UF
heres what youve said
Originally Posted by HalfBaked
Originally Posted by Halfbaked
Last edited by Hulud; 11-20-2006 at 01:25 AM.
Val for President
I want a rematch...then again im a little biased...
Originally Posted by rollininstyle2004
then your voice doesnt count LOL
Val for President
Ya, but it was week 1.
Look at the stats of the game. Mcfadden was hurt and hardly played so was Felix Jones.
Arkansas is healthy now and there running backs are basically 100%.
It'd be an entirely different game now.
no it wouldnt beOriginally Posted by HalfBaked
2 players would NOT make up 40 points
Val for President
Confidence does.Originally Posted by Hulud
they wouldnt have the confidence after an ass whoopin like thatOriginally Posted by HalfBaked
![]()
Val for President
actually, with darren mcfadden and the way he's been playing, i would say he could single handedly make up at least half that difference (40pts) while the defense could make up the other 20pts. i couldn't give 2 shits about the razorbacks but if u've been watching how they've been playing, u too would wish they could have played usc the way they are now instead of at the beginning of the yr.