Heisman Trophy

[BanginJimmy]

1. I explained why in my first post.

I read your first post. It has nothing but baseless speculation. In fact, the points you made in that post are more beneficial to Gerhart than Ingram. The point about Bama not being as good without Ingram has alrady been refuted.

2. Yes it is an individual award. But would it go to a player with equal starts whose team went 0-13? No, it sure as hell wouldn't. Im not saying the overall team record plays 100% in to it, and it shouldnt. But the "individual player" that wins the award has to prove he can help his team win when it counts.

A player with Gerhart's stats on an 0-12 team should absolutely run away with the award. BTW, players dont play iron man football anymore. All they can be asked to do is play their position. With that in mind, Suh is so far ahead of the pack this year, they should probably give him next year's Heisman also to make things equitable.

3. No, I did not see the LSU/Bama game. Did they have to plead/beg for a review to get 1 second back on the clock so they could pray for a field goal? If not, then its not the same as the Texas game.

No, LSU didnt have to get a review. They simply let the clock expire for no reason.

BTW, as much as I would have loved to see Texas lose that game, the review was correct. The officials could ahve probably put 1 more second back on the clock also. The only reason the thousands of similar plays arent reviewed is because no one asks for the review.


This isnt a knock on Ingram at all. He had an outstanding season, its just that he wasnt the best player in CFB this year. The best player in CFB this year was Suh, and there wasnt anyone else that was even close.