360 vs. PS3 (Post Halo 3)

[The12lber]

ya know that everyone has an ******* right.. their likeopinions yada yada

you say we have no games..

u say u have halo and i played it and its pretty bad. sorry thats my opinion. you loving halo doesnt mean everyone does.

Your opinion doesn't mean the majority doesn't rtard. It averaged high reviews and excellent critical comments, its a good game.

Sorry, I am not going to use your nuanced opinion alone as the barometer of what is good.

The playstation consoles havnt always had the best fps's but look around generally and they have the best games in other genre's.

Such as?

And heavenly sword was a amazing game btw. i loved it and have played it over many times. RFOM was also alot more fun that halo 3 was.

Okay, but on average Heavenly Sword got a 70% and RFOM got a high 80.

Admittingly bioshock was also good, but pc hi!

The vast majority of gamers don't have a PC that can run this. If you want to drop a few thousand dollars, sure.

ratchet and clank might be the most fun game ive ever played so far.

Okay, but most people thought it was just pretty good.

SO now. when developers are saying that the game you can buy on the ps3 and 360, will play better on the ps3... such as assasins creed, dmc4 etc. would you still buy em for your 360.. and in terms of over priced.. 399.99 for everything included = overpriced??? oh my.

I never said it was overpriced, what are you, insane?

If you can find comments from the Assassin's Creed developers that confirm what fine, but I find this to be an unlikely statement.

and everyone who kept saying they delayed GTAIV cus of the ps3 the dev's just said it wasn't due to that reason.


hrmm.
everyones starting a thread on this and everyone putting out because i love halo everyone does and because i havnt played a single ps3 game they all suck. But ill say this. this time, next year the ps3 will CLEARLY be shown to be superior in quality, games, graphics, ai, etc.

Okay, give me some kind of supporting evidence to back this claim. For example, show me some releases other than MGS4 that are being made by developers with good track records, etc, etc?

P.S for the guy who always says that the ps3 has a inferior gpu due to having less memory, needs to read up on the ps3 and realize that the 360's gpu has x amount of memory and thats its. the ps3's gpu can share processing and memory witht he cell's SPE's and thus its memory isn't limited to the 256. thanks. Aka if needed it has alot more memory. and even when not needed so far.. they say games are gonna look better starting with AC.

Actually, what I said was, the PS3 has an inferior GPU AND less memory.

More over, GPU "borrowing" memory from the core is an unreliable system.

If you're not going to post based on some kind of fact, don't post to begin with. Simply saying "WELL I THOUGHT <X> SUCKED AND <Y> RULED" in the context of an argument is lame.

www.Gamerankings.com

www.Metacritic.com

Try it out.

Also, in regards to whoever was trying to parallel the consoles with old and new TVs etc, this is an unintelligble comparison because.
1)The quality of a television fully is defined by its hardware and associated technology.
2)A video game console is fully defined by its hardware (PS3 and Xbox 360, although being released a year apart, are highly comparable in this venue) and the software available for that console.
3)Xbox's earlier release date isn't an adequate explanation for the lack of quality exclusive releases on PS3, the lower quality of the exclusive content thus far released, the lack of quality games (based on evidence like developer track records/available funds/time etc) currently in development for the PS3 nor does it address the fact that Microsoft has developed relationships for exclusive content with more reputable developers.