
Originally Posted by
The12lber
I am not going to go around digging up failure rate statistics for the 360, but seriously, Killzone Two?
IGN called the first one "underwhelming and mediocre", it got crappy reviews around the board and the general consensus was the graphics and audio were the only things the held the game's crappy gameplay and buggy performance together into something decent.
Why expect the second one to be any better?
The PS3's "top games" have all been to this point either multiplatform or inferior to Xbox's exclusives, and the reviews will back me up on this.
As much as I cringe at the thought of gaming publication asshats being the measuring stick here, it certainly is a lot better than simply stating that <x> <y> <z> sucks "cuz I said so".