WTF are you talking about, your facts have been false and full of ****. You need help with your thinking and logic. When you have owned both systems then you can comment, until then STFU.Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
Printable View
WTF are you talking about, your facts have been false and full of ****. You need help with your thinking and logic. When you have owned both systems then you can comment, until then STFU.Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
i dont need to try harder at anything. where did i say your first post? like i said your raggedy post of 360 BS youve been bragging about all over this thread. "well according to *lame site* and *some sh!t* your critics reviews are clearly leading blah blah blah" STFU!Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
get some more useless reviews and stats
I wouldn't really call replying to your baseless comments bragging. More over, you are right, and I should clearly put more stock in the opinions of idiots such as yourself as opposed to a composite of what hundreds of people who are generally reputable journalists thought.Quote:
Originally Posted by Schugg
I invite you to prove me wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
fukn noobs never give up. its not opposed to what 100's think, its opposed to what one little diary writing douche bag journalist decide to a write about to make it more interesting, and catch peoples attention. of course he is going to write about 360's stuff, and go enhance everything to make it better, cause more people have the 360 meaning more people will read his BS. its not about writing whats true, its about writing what people want to hear, when more people have something over another, there going to take the path that gets them read more
you are wrong because your stupid facts are. Just like these dumbass people who talk about the 360 is so dominate. Well lets see how long has the 360 been out compared to the ps3. So the 360 should have more, but facts to facts the ps3 is better. Buy the time you buy **** to equal the ps3,you will have spent equal to more the price of the ps3. Also by time mid 2008 ps3 will have more games than 360.Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
You didn't point out which of my facts were wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
Gamerankings is a composite (average!) of professional journalist's reviews of games, rtard. More over, only a few large gaming publications exclusively provide news for <x> system. The notion that the people on the PS3 side of (IGN, Gamespy, Gameinformer, Kotaku, etc) intentionally review PS3 games low is probably the lamest attempt I have ever seen to mitigate the lack of quality in PS3's line up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Schugg
Nothing you posted is fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
So, factually speaking, Xbox 360's exclusives don't have higher average reviews than PS3's exclusives?Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
While a review score is essentially an opinion based on a mix of tangible and intangible factors, averaging review scores from the same publication is pretty much the closest thing to objective you are going to get when comparing art (movies, books, games, etc).
And it is indeed a fact that the Xbox 360 has higher reviewed exclusives, so, neaner, you need to think harder about what constitutes a fact.
dumb dumb, dont you know most 360 games came out before ps3. so they have reviews first.Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
I think what you're trying to articulate in a very minimal way here is "Xbox has been out longer so naturally it has more good games at the moment, but just you wait, PS3 has an untapped potential that will be fully realized in both scope and depth in the coming months... AND IT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND"Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
This doesn't support an argument that PS3 has more AAA titles (or even any to begin with), have top tier releases that are better than 360's or address why a year after PS3's release none of its exclusive titles have cracked a 9/10 average or why its most hyped releases (Lair, Heavenly Sword) fell far short of expectations.
Because those are bull****. Ps3 players play RFOM, Graw 2, Rb6V, and now cod4Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
You know you can play those on a 360 as well, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
I have a 360 too. So what you throw around is bull.Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
I'm sorry, are you trying to say that my argument that Xbox 360 has a higher volume of higher quality exclusive titles is "bull" because you acknowledge the best games to play on PS3 are multiplatform releases?Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
This argument is logically incongruous.
everyone get your panties out of your butt and shut up. who cares people will always hate on the other system thats just how it goes. both systems just need to make a huge online gaming arena so people can beat the crap out of each other on games that are a multi platform release. like COD4
anyways COD 4 is sick. ak74u and ak47 with the red dot and sick.
im at level 32ish now
That would work out too heavily in the favor of PC gamers.Quote:
Originally Posted by LeGeNdaRyLeGeNd
holy sh!t, still rambeling on. im starting a new thread, stay in this one with your theories.
I rented it last night.
I didnt like using the controller for FPS, so I will be getting it for PC.
I beat it already. Got all the intel...now Im bored. Time to get NFS and Assasins and SOF
:lmfao: +1Quote:
Originally Posted by The12lber
Ps3 is so much better then xbox. Sony For Life, COD4 is a bad ass game. so much better then rainbow six bs
idk bout PS3s.....but u can play with a mouse and keyboard or PS2 controller on 360Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisdavis
I have heard there are several games that will have keyboard/mouse support on PS3. I was hoping that COD4 would be one of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by HypnoToad
Xbox 360 definitely doesn't support mouse and keyboard for gameplay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisdavis
use the fragfx controller. people use that for alot of ps3 games the number one guy on the game uses it he has a 4.xx kill/ratio
geezus with the money all u ppl pay for video game **** u could have nice real cars...
It looks intersting, how much was it?Quote:
Originally Posted by LeGeNdaRyLeGeNd
didn't know an extra 60 bucks could buy me a nicer car... im fine with what i have nowQuote:
Originally Posted by BATMOBL
I beat the game in 6 hours on regular mode. The game was kick ass although VERY SHORT.
i couldnt believe i beat it in that amount of time frame.
Please tell me there is MUCH MORE in the ONLINE game.
online is nasty.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. KiDD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. KiDD
play veteran and beat it in 6 hours, with no cheats. and online is like a whole new game. have to unlock weapons, challenges and all kinds of stuff.
i just started playing online 3 days ago... hit lvl 27 last night. This game is addicting online lol
online is addicting as hell, i love doing search and destroy. pretty much all ive played.