Photos By: Sid Fligel
[url=http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8199/8176964987_c96fd62128_b.jpg]
![]()
Photos By: Sid Fligel
[url=http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8199/8176964987_c96fd62128_b.jpg]
![]()
I think I seen this car in person, it was with a gtr at QT in Doraville, super clean, no doubt
AFA HOLLYWOOD PREMIER LEAGUE EST. 1998
i normally like 350z's but this one is ugly as shit.
Why do blue wheels and bright red seats?
Looks good as a whole, though.
This car has had some serious work put into it, however, less is more. It looks good, but this just isn't my style.
twenty-two
Looks useless...cage and all.
Maybe im wrong. But something tells me this thing would totally useless on a track or anywhere that cage was needed.
'82 TE72 SR5 Sport Coupe
3tc
Why put a cage in for hard parking and pictures. They are a PITA unless it is there to save your life.
Car looks clean but i mean, a cage.....really?
'82 TE72 SR5 Sport Coupe
3tc
You guys missed the point....
No biggie
'82 TE72 SR5 Sport Coupe
3tc
Lot of expensive parts to make a car look stupid and tacky. blue wheels + blue cage + red seats looks ridiculous. Fender flares like that work on a 70s datsun or a jeep wrangler, they dont work on a 350z.
With a few changes this car could look extremely good, but the couple of things i would remove are so over the top annoying that it ruins the entire car for me.
I got your point and i agree with it.
you missed mine about the cage on a car that doesn't see a track. Its useless. Its like a bike rack on the roof and you have no bike. useless
'82 TE72 SR5 Sport Coupe
3tc
I really like this! What are the details on the aero?
1999 Integra GS sold
1996 Mitsu Galant sold
1995 Volvo 850 daily
1997 Volvo 850 T5 5-speed project (M56h tranny, IPD boost con, 15G angled turbine, R clutch, NA intake mani+ 960TB, ARD 17psi tune)
http://southrnfresh.com/wordpress/kous-350z/
The mod list is on the site, i would post it but im on my phone,.
The owners idea was the old school flare look, blue and red have always been coordinating colors to me.
But i dont see the big deal with having parts that are not useful, most of the crap we buy on our cars we dont use it for what its for. Do we all need to have 2000$ suspension to drive around 285 all day and go to work? I dont know why you all dont know how this works.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Just two different crowds, J.
There's the "I do it because it looks good" crowd and there's the "I do it, regardless of how it looks, because it performs as I need it to"
All goes back to the Form > < = Function discussion. They're never going to see eye to eye.
Old school looks look good on old school cars, Joe. It just doesn't look good. I guess a more fitting wide body kit would have been suited for this car. I don't about the two colors being coordinated, but they just don't look good how they are applied.
Now this I'm not worried about. I personally wouldn't do a roll cage in a daily, but (as with his entire car) it's his car to do whatever. And you know I'm with you buying stuff (or not buying stuff) on cars that we don't "need." You know good and well how much my suspension set up cost, lolol.
Alot of hating going on...I like it just they way it is. CLEAN!
JkC|photographics
K-Figure Fhoto's
-05 TSX-
-97 Integra GS-R-
-08 Ninja ZX-6R-
I dig it overall, but I have to agree with the cage comments. That's just flexin lol. Nice ride though I'm not dissing the guy at all.
This car barely looks drivable, I'd never substitute performance for looks. If I have a sports car I want to drive it like a sports car and not have to worry about breaking anything. Thats just me though, But hey, if you wanna spend $20k+ on you car to look pretty for the camera go right ahead.
i know lowering a car doesnt mean it's designated for tracking but w/ the train of thought of SOME in this thread...they think it looks bad because it has 'track related' parts and it's more than likely just a hard parker. you can not like the car because you dont like it, but i dont see the gripe of getting up in arms about not liking it because it should be a track car... <--- if any of that made sense
one thing i do agree with is the fact that nice looking kits are being used "not this one, i still say this is butt ugly" on cars instead of the "OEM called JDM" look. now if we can stop having to look at our VIN #'s to see what kind of car's we drive, that would be great.
It looks pretty mean. If it weren't quite so low and had proper fitting tires, I would think it to be a true track beast.
G37s 6MT/coupe
G37s 6MT/coupe