Jetta with MEDIUM SCHOOL wheels

[87 Turbo II]

It's actually very relevant. You're calling BS on something you know nothing of. Someone could call you smart and I could say BS, but I can't because I don't know. I know what I did and how I did it. Who are you that I need to prove my past to? Who are you that I need to back up what I say. If I didn't do it, I wouldn't say it. Why would I make up that I can drive a slammed car? There's no one to impress here.

Regardless of the fact that you are not obligated to prove yourself, the fact that there is no real answer to the question still just hurts the credibility of the original statement "shenanegans" was called against, but do as you wish, if you're happy with what you know happened and don't feel there is anyone you have to prove it to, then that just shows extreme self confidence. But a few skeptics and I will always think otherwise to the truth and credibility of your claim, but if you're ok with that, power to you.

But...but, you said these "teams of brilliant people" made the cars to where their intent was.Why modify it.....unless...wait for it.....you WANT to.

This is a good point, and I won't get into any further than I already have. I'll make my argument very weak by stating my views as opinions and just agree to disagree.

Says who?

I'll quote myself here and say "the fact that this is all my opinion is implied."

I never said that I don't say anything negative about someone's car. But I also don't go around ranting and raving and writing essays on why they did their car the way they did why what they do is bullshit. Talk about irrelevance.

Admittedly it may be a good bit out of line for me to start throwing the B.S. flag up at people's intentions and trying to say why they do what they do, but hey, it's I.A., and statistically, there will always be a good chunk of retards who fit the description perfectly that one can generalize and make the statement (mostly) true.

It's really not irrelevant at all if you were to actually think about it.

well anything can be made irrelevant or relevant depending on who backs it up and how well they thought to link situations or break links, it's all the talent of the people in debate, so yes, it could be made relevant with good argument to support it.

If an empty band wagon ever stopped on IA, it would be overcrowded by the time it left the station. Very true.

agreed and it is annoying haha

There was irrationality and it really wasn't that far from ownage...although I wasn't trying to do that. I'm actually kind of surprised that you decided to "attack" me. I didn't know we had any problems, but if you do, that's cool. I'm not too worried about it. Later, QD.

No real attack, I just enjoy intellegent debate. Consider it a compliment that I actually took the time to think about your points and creat counterpoints of my own. Not that you have the insecurity to need complimnents, but I guess as a top dog on this site, debating with you just felt more coherent and challenging that ti would have with well over 85% of the members here. Most of the O.G. posters are like this though.(that does NOT mean I consider myself one). We're cool though, just friendly debate(granted I should reserve the word "bullshit" for less professional and more immature childish posts). So don't view it as attacking you at all, no problems with you.

[quickdodge®]

... just hurts the credibility of the original statement "shenanegans" was called against,

No credibility was lost at all.

but do as you wish, if you're happy with what you know happened and don't feel there is anyone you have to prove it to, then that just shows extreme self confidence. But a few skeptics and I will always think otherwise to the truth and credibility of your claim,

I don't know of but one skeptic (you). And I'm still not sure of why you would think I would make this up.

it's I.A., and statistically, there will always be a good chunk of retards who fit the description perfectly that one can generalize and make the statement (mostly) true.

Unfortunately, you're right.

No real attack, I just enjoy intellegent debate. Consider it a compliment that I actually took the time to think about your points and creat counterpoints of my own. Not that you have the insecurity to need complimnents, but I guess as a top dog on this site, debating with you just felt more coherent and challenging that ti would have with well over 85% of the members here. Most of the O.G. posters are like this though.(that does NOT mean I consider myself one). We're cool though, just friendly debate(granted I should reserve the word "bullshit" for less professional and more immature childish posts). So don't view it as attacking you at all, no problems with you.[/QUOTE]

Good to hear that no problems exist and it was, surprisingly, an intelligent back-n-forth conversation. I wouldn't really call it a debate because we were "arguing" over something that wasn't debatable.

We shall meet again, lolol. Later, QD.