SED3 Turner Field Pit Pictures only
Sorry for taking so long
[IMG]![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography/
SED3 Turner Field Pit Pictures only
Sorry for taking so long
[IMG]![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography/
Last edited by KPFphotography; 04-21-2010 at 04:15 PM.
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8
please tell me that this is not THE "Pur Pur" 240 that was cleaner than clean.
great shots though.
I like the one of Andys!
No action shots?![]()
They will be up later today, havent had time to edit them yet. I just wanted to get something up
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8
nice shoots
(((((No more 4 door))))))
are you using a filter on these? if so what kind? where are these hosted? something is going on dude.
good stuff kev![]()
just a uv. from flickr. WHY?
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8
are they hosted on flickr or photobucket? Page info says photobucket....
yea sorry photobucket, and same lens, same host same everything ive always done
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8
I dunno, are yall saying they ALL look cloudy and not focused? Bc I really cant tell on my screens
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8
A good example to me is shot 2 and shot 3. shot 2 looks great, but shot 3 looks like the colors and focus is being seen through water....looks off here, but decent there, and good at that spot.
upload shot 3 on flickr and compare?
well the focus on that shot was on the rear car, so the front is out of focus slightly. But i do see what your saying. Not all the shots are like that though. its cool, im editing the other shots now so hopefully they will weigh themselves out lol
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8
u sir are the man u got shot of that Nismo 240z. and a shot of my car (it's becoming like where's waldo) thanx
that pur (was) a clean 240. . . . . .
ATL DAsquad Member #9
honestly, you should really link them from flickr instead of photobucket. You can tell in the comparison below that photobucket kills the image quality.
photobucket
flickr
![]()
OR you should just host them yourself on your own personal server, so theres no loss in quality at all. :boobies:
yea, is there a place in flickr i can pull the whole list up and copy paste without doing it one by one?
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8
Bump
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8
Then its probably not your server causing the degradation in image quality, its probably your conversion to .jpg format when posting. Theres a lot of things that can cause color quality and image quality difference, but any personal server should not affect the quality itself. Posting in a lossless format is the only way to prevent it.
nice pics as always.
The bump was for the new pics
http://kpfphotography.showitsite.com/
www.Drifted.com
www.flickr.com/photos/kpfphotography
Nikon D90*18-105mm f3.5-5.6*35mm f1.8