Justin's CB7 - haters beware *warning* stance content inside *warning*

[RL...]

I've liked the old look better, but this new look is still good.

As far as the definition of stance goes....I believe the fitment of the front and rear should be identical, but the front of this car shows more tire than the rear which doesn't make it look right...

[e30pwr]

I've liked the old look better, but this new look is still good.

As far as the definition of stance goes....I believe the fitment of the front and rear should be identical, but the front of this car shows more tire than the rear which doesn't make it look right...

you do realize that for this to be true he couldn't turn right?

[RL...]

[CENTER]Well, if you haven't checked out my other threads please do, but I also noticed this nasty stanced CB7 at Import Alliance. Having talked to the owner Justin for a minute I not only went from wondering why, to wondering how? Soon there will be a better set of shots, but until then this will have to do. This man has the definition of stance on point and I want to see where he goes with this!

you do realize that for this to be true he couldn't turn right?

As you can tell in that pic the rear tucks more tire than the front does....I was just pointing out that I do not think this car is the best example of stance out there as the front "stance" does not match the rear "stance"...If he raised the rear a 1/2 inch it would probably match the front. I don't see why he shouldn't be able to turn.

[e30pwr]

As you can tell in that pic the rear tucks more tire than the front does....I was just pointing out that I do not think this car is the best example of stance out there as the front "stance" does not match the rear "stance"...If he raised the rear a 1/2 inch it would probably match the front. I don't see why he shouldn't be able to turn.

I was seeing your statement as saying dropping the front lower to match the rear, thats where the problem would en lie.

QD - i see what your getting at.

[CB7tuner]

agree to disagree