The Best Prelude I Have Ever Seen

[quickdodge®]

I am thinking the same as you....

But you were still wrong. Later, QD,

[josh green]

But you were still wrong. Later, QD,

Prove it, you cannot.

[Nerdsrock22]

Prove it, you cannot.

A challenger appears....

[josh green]

He cannot prove that my statement to what was quoted in my post is wrong. Now if he wants to be super technical and say that technically "older" means the 1st gen as well which was produced between the years of 79-82 and then in 83 the 2nd gen came to be until the year of 87, blah blah. As far as what was quoted and my reply to the quote, I win /discussion.

[quickdodge®]

I win /discussion.

Actually, I've never been "beaten" on here and I still hold that undefeated mark.

Truth is, I misread the first part where I thought you were saying it was a third gen Prelude. Then (just now) I realized that I was looking backwards on the second part. I was looking at you saying 87 and older and, for some reason, I was thinking 87 and up was what you were saying for the third gen.

Basically I read your post pretty much backwards so you were correct. I just misread your post. So no, you didn't "win." You were just right in the beginning.

And lastly, don't ever "claim a victory" against me unless you have one. That would be like Spud Webb claiming to outdunk Shaq. Later, QD

[josh green]

Actually, I've never been "beaten" on here and I still hold that undefeated mark.

Truth is, I misread the first part where I thought you were saying it was a third gen Prelude. Then (just now) I realized that I was looking backwards on the second part. I was looking at you saying 87 and older and, for some reason, I was thinking 87 and up was what you were saying for the third gen.

Basically I read your post pretty much backwards so you were correct. I just misread your post. So no, you didn't "win." You were just right in the beginning.

And lastly, don't ever "claim a victory" against me unless you have one. That would be like Spud Webb claiming to outdunk Shaq. Later, QD

I could really care less about "winning or losing" I was just stating that I was not incorrect. I have no IA ego/ image to maintain, nor do I have a feeling of empowerment that some seek on this site in "dueling" with you. I know you like people to prove things and I was simply asking the same of you.

[quickdodge®]

I could really care less about "winning or losing" I was just stating that I was not incorrect.

You also stated that:

I win /discussion

Right? But you care less.

I have no IA ego/ image to maintain, nor do I have a feeling of empowerment that some seek on this site. I know you like people to prove things and I was simply asking the same of you.

I don't have an image to maintain either. You didn't prove anything. I proved what I needed to in the thought processes I had that you were wrong. Turns out I was just misreading your post. Later, QD.