WAY too much poke for my taste..
Flush
Fail
WAY too much poke for my taste..
hmmm... i beg to differ. i believe what you were trying to refer to was the stretch. the stretch may be a bit much for your tastes. the poke on the other hand is no where near as extreme as some.Originally Posted by _Christian_
By "poke" i meant POKE. kthnxOriginally Posted by Dirty Octopus™
ohhhhhhh.... makes sense notOriginally Posted by _Christian_
![]()
![]()
Both the car you posted and the original car (for sure) have rims that stick out a couple of inches further than the fender. Seems like poke to me.Originally Posted by Dirty Octopus™
yeah. thats a poke but what i was trying to express is that the front is as bad as the rear and the rear isnt as bad as lot of other vehicles. ive seen PLENTY worse. i guess im a victim of being exposed to a lot more pokage.Originally Posted by Deke
BTW they're the same car.
lolz Noooooooo silly! the stretch actually could have been substantially less. i think if the stretch was less the poke wouldn't have looked so bad.Originally Posted by _Christian_
Lol oops. The first picture makes the stance look far more ridiculous.Originally Posted by Dirty Octopus™
It doesn't make sense for me to think it has too much poke?Originally Posted by Dirty Octopus™
...ok. The stretch is right for the amount of poke, but I'd prefer less of both and it'd still be possible to achieve stance without as much poke.
Yup.Originally Posted by _Christian_
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed