Good thing that's not all E36 M3s, it'd be a whole bunch of ugly![]()
Good thing that's not all E36 M3s, it'd be a whole bunch of ugly![]()
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Says the guy with one of the most plasticy, glued together and rental-esque muscle cars ever made. Or lack there-of muscle...Originally Posted by cgEvan
Don't get me started on the emo-hatch.
Originally Posted by OnURleft
You never said anything about it looking ugly![]()
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Rental carOriginally Posted by cgEvan
Plasticy
Glued together
the words speak for themselves. Keep blacking it out to hide the lines and the B-A functional hood scoops.
I am aware you sold the Emo-mobile. That doesn't mean you didn't drive it around....lololololoHatch? What hatch? I don't have a hatch. lolol![]()
Better looking car than an E36, NutswingerOriginally Posted by OnURleft
![]()
The car had graffiti on it, last I checked, that wasn't emo... nor was anything about the carI am aware you sold the Emo-mobile. That doesn't mean you didn't drive it around.You kind of sound stupid.
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
I'm not nutswinging anything, but arguing that your 4,000 pile of shit for a design is better looking than an M3 is pretty funny. Typical Pontiac owner arguing how their sporty Grand-Am GT is so much cheaper and better than a BMWOriginally Posted by cgEvan
And it's o.k, if momma says being o.k is different then it's o.k
lol. "typical pontiac owner"Originally Posted by OnURleft
LOL.
First pontiac I own and I'm a typical pontiac owner. What's 4,000 asshat?
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Hatch? What hatch? I don't have a hatch. lololOriginally Posted by OnURleft
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx