I wasn't sure where to post so I figured this would be the right forum. I'm looking for anyone who owns a DSLR or equivilent to take pics for me. If anyone is interested pm me with price. Would like to get a photoshoot soon, located in gwinnett.
any DSLR owners? or professional photographers?
I wasn't sure where to post so I figured this would be the right forum. I'm looking for anyone who owns a DSLR or equivilent to take pics for me. If anyone is interested pm me with price. Would like to get a photoshoot soon, located in gwinnett.
to be honest man, i don't think there are any here....i mean i can't think of anyone...except well.....pretty much everyone who posts in this area. sheesh.Originally Posted by IntegraXTR
Changaroo, Nemesis(don't know if he still doin business), Chad, Bandy, They take some very, very professional pictures. Changaroo the sh!t. Nemesis the sh!t. Chad the sh!t. Bandy is working on being the sh!t, but is getting better with every click of the shutter. That is all. g/l
Shits real out here. You betta keep a strap and learn somethin'.
i have a D40 with the kit lense, but im still really learning.
Yeah, I know.
sweet
Last edited by Brady; 07-17-2008 at 06:27 PM.
dont even put me in the same category as georgey poo and changy chang!!!!
I'll do it
pm me with what you have in mind.
Go with Changaroo. He is amazing definitely takes my favorite photos.
^^ Yeah, I drew a frame of a man running on each fan blade. That is him running at idle
you came to the right place, everyone on ia is a professional photographer. all you have to do is get a point and shoot and you're off to a good start.
on a serious note, speedminded took amazing shots of my car, changaroo is also really good. but speedminded is the best imo.
I shoot pro, but don't have much of my stuff up on here. Shoot me a pm if you still haven't found someone.
NIKON Squad member | Nikon D200 | Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 | Sigma 70-200 f/2.8
Shoot me a PM!
Let's do it!
Was JUST about a make a post. Got some new glass I want to play with!
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed
Its ok pookie don't cry....dont even put me in the same category as georgey poo and changy chang!!!!
Shits real out here. You betta keep a strap and learn somethin'.
from what ive seen ching chang
wally wally bing bang!!!!
roflmao
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed
someone was bound to finish it
photoshoot has been setup with DinanM3atl for this sunday, can't wait.... Will update with pics when its all done. Thanks Dinan!
Cya then!
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed
There is a guy on Flickr witch is local. He takes some crazy HDRs. His name on there is antiundersteer, It looks like he's got some bad ass camera, cause even night shots of race cars on the track are awsome
Wonder who that is.
I am not a huge fan of HDR but I can do them. Not hard
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed
oh, I know it's not hard, but the guy also takes great photos of cars. I think that's what he does for a living, I'm not sure though. I wish I could do that for a living, but I don't have the camera, cause if I did, I would
They are fun for a bit, I just think they got a bit played out too quick. Everyone was posting HDR's here and there and everywhere!
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed
well, if you think about it, you do tonal mapping on most of your RAW files before you turn them into JPGs. I've even done it to JPGs a bit, since PhotoShop's Camera Raw came out. It just helps with making pictures more realistic. Now you can go overboard with it and make them look like airbrush art, but if you only do it a bit, The can look much better then regular photos. HDR even gives photos more depth. That's my opinion at least
Originally an HDR is used when you cannot correctly setup the exposure in a single shot. Now it has simply become a Post Processing method to 'enhance' the photo.
Just my opinion. It isn't wrong and I have seen some SWEET HDRs but just not for me
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed
I just can't wait until they come out with sensors that have a higher dynamic range then 12bit - 16bit, cause if you think about it, HDR's are really Normal Dynamic Range images. since the eye has the same dynamic range, and normal photos are really Low Dynamic Range images
im with ya dude. HDR isnt my cup of tea either.Originally an HDR is used when you cannot correctly setup the exposure in a single shot. Now it has simply become a Post Processing method to 'enhance' the photo.
Just my opinion. It isn't wrong and I have seen some SWEET HDRs but just not for me
There's plenty of shots that you simply can not take without the use of HDR if you expect to properly expose the background and the car.
The problem is 3 out of 4 HDRs I see on the net could have been exposed in a single shot. Instead they are overdone and look 'fake'.
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
