Thread of Immortality (S14 pics)

[JBizzlebone]

This isn't an argument. An argument consists of two disagreeing sides with a valid point made on both. You're missing out.



You're right in that we can put this to rest because you keep missing where I've negated this "point" perfectly every time you try to bring it up. [b]I CAN NOT BAN PEOPLE. THIS WHITEHARTMAN FUCC OPENLY ADMITTED TO BEING ON HERE UNDERAGE. I'm not sure how I can be any clearer.



I have nothing to prove to you. You say the same the same thing that everyone else that gets into it with me says. And because I haven't got the red square ought to tell you something. I'm not even close to what your ASSUMPTIONS of me are.



This gets automatically vetoed since it is a "result" of the above "point" since the above "point" was shown invalid.

The overall gist of this is that you're doing nothing new by trying your (lolol) wits against mine. It's been attempted on many occasions. I'll let you in on why I've never been "put to rest." I don't get into debates about things of which I know nothing. That would make me look the fool. This is why you look the fool among the regular IA members. They know who I am on the real. Not the online me. The person you are trying to best is someone that you're making ASSUMPTIONS about. Commenting on lack of education and wit and all. This is why you're whole "argument (as you call it)" is baseless. And people actually knowing me is how I was able to make it this far. So marinate on that for a second before you reply again. Remember that you're basing this rift with me solely on me helping get Gilligan banned and not anyone else. Remember also that Gilligan made several posts bragging that he was on here underage and that he was still here. You should be able to see this and we can move on. I'd rather move on than participate in this as you're not a bad dude. Later, QD.

It's funny that you say that because you seem to be doing the same to me. Saying we're not on the same pedastal and how you're so much more intelligent than I am. I'm simply trying to defend myself on that point and I don't think people would look at me as a fool because of it. I, also, don't get into arguments I know nothing about which is why I wanted to put the whitemanhart thing to rest. People with a "holier than thou" attitude just rub off on me the wrong way. Maybe you're not like that in person, but it's hard to tell through your insults and so-called "witty" posts. It seems like you're trying to hide the person you really are under all the "I'm smarter than you" pretenses.

[quickdodge®]

I, also, don't get into arguments I know nothing about

You did here.

which is why I wanted to put the whitemanhart thing to rest.

Ok, cool. We can drop it and move on.

People with a "holier than thou" attitude just rub off on me the wrong way. Maybe you're not like that in person, but it's hard to tell through your insults and so-called "witty" posts. It seems like you're trying to hide the person you really are under all the "I'm smarter than you" pretenses.

You'd be an idiot to really believe that I think that of myself. I just post it to see what reactions I get. And we've already discussed why (only) you don't find my posts "witty." And trust on this last note: I'm hiding nothing in the intelligence department. There are things that can be hidden through the Web, but an idiot will not be able to consistently type the way I do with proper word usage, sentence structure and spelling. I'm as smart as I say I am and portray myself. That part isn't an E-personality.

We ready for a truce? Later, QD.