
Originally Posted by
quickdodge®
This isn't an argument. An argument consists of two disagreeing sides with a valid point made on both. You're missing out.
You're right in that we can put this to rest because you keep missing where I've negated this "point" perfectly every time you try to bring it up. [b]I CAN NOT BAN PEOPLE. THIS WHITEHARTMAN FUCC OPENLY ADMITTED TO BEING ON HERE UNDERAGE. I'm not sure how I can be any clearer.
I have nothing to prove to you. You say the same the same thing that everyone else that gets into it with me says. And because I haven't got the red square ought to tell you something. I'm not even close to what your ASSUMPTIONS of me are.
This gets automatically vetoed since it is a "result" of the above "point" since the above "point" was shown invalid.
The overall gist of this is that you're doing nothing new by trying your (lolol) wits against mine. It's been attempted on many occasions. I'll let you in on why I've never been "put to rest." I don't get into debates about things of which I know nothing. That would make me look the fool. This is why you look the fool among the regular IA members. They know who I am on the real. Not the online me. The person you are trying to best is someone that you're making ASSUMPTIONS about. Commenting on lack of education and wit and all. This is why you're whole "argument (as you call it)" is baseless. And people actually knowing me is how I was able to make it this far. So marinate on that for a second before you reply again. Remember that you're basing this rift with me solely on me helping get Gilligan banned and not anyone else. Remember also that Gilligan made several posts bragging that he was on here underage and that he was still here. You should be able to see this and we can move on. I'd rather move on than participate in this as you're not a bad dude. Later, QD.