Thread of Immortality (S14 pics)

[quickdodge®]

I have a lot of concrete evidence of you being a complete douche bag, it's all over my post.

What the evidence is in your post is NOT the evidence that you think it is. It is evidence. But of something entirely different.

I think it's that I just get a sense of a lack or morals on your part.

Lolol.

I'm cool with him getting banned about being underage. It's the rules, and rules must be followed, no matter how ridiculous they are. I just wish you/they would hold true to your values and ban the rest of the underage people floating around here. It just seemed like you were targeting him, thats what I wasn't cool about.

First off, you don't have to be cool with it or not. It's not your rule. Second, I can't ban anyone. Only reason I mentioned him was because he was outright bragging about it to me. SO the dummy had himself banned. I don't know who the others are.

I'm failing to see your "educational prowess" or you "endowment of common sense" because if you had just a little bit of any on those, you could understand my posts and where I'm coming from. You just seem to ignore any points I'm making and attacking me personally. I know you didn't say it outright, but you're trying to portray to me and everyone on the forum that somehow, you have a hightened sense understanding that exceeds anyone on the forum.

Lolol @ you "attacking" my educational gains. You have no idea, little one. None. As far as ignoring any points, I've seen none. There haven't been any made. On your part, that is.

Put your ego on the shelf for a minute and maybe I'll take you seriously.

I don't care if you take me seriously or not. I don't take you seriously. But hey, as much fun as this could have been, I'm calling it a night. Good luck with your car. Later, QD.

[JBizzlebone]

What the evidence is in your post is NOT the evidence that you think it is. It is evidence. But of something entirely different.



Lolol.



First off, you don't have to be cool with it or not. It's not your rule. Second, I can't ban anyone. Only reason I mentioned him was because he was outright bragging about it to me. SO the dummy had himself banned. I don't know who the others are.



Lolol @ you "attacking" my educational gains. You have no idea, little one. None. As far as ignoring any points, I've seen none. There haven't been any made. On your part, that is.



I don't care if you take me seriously or not. I don't take you seriously. But hey, as much fun as this could have been, I'm calling it a night. Good luck with your car. Later, QD.

Well, this post will be here tomorrow, so we can continue if you want. I love arguing and would love to continue. So here's something for you to stew over and come back at me with. I can't wait to here your response.

There have been plenty of points made, again, you're just failing to see them. I'll point them out for you:

-If your gonna ban one person for being underage, ban the rest.(this ones been beat all to hell and I think we can put it to rest)

-You have yet to prove to me how you're so much better than the rest of us. Usually people with that kind of attitude get the red square up top. I'm not sure how you made it this far, I guess you've hid it very well. Or thats saying something about IA.

-You come off as a major douche as a result of the above point.

-My pink wheels own your face

[quickdodge®]

I love arguing and would love to continue.

This isn't an argument. An argument consists of two disagreeing sides with a valid point made on both. You're missing out.

-If your gonna ban one person for being underage, ban the rest.(this ones been beat all to hell and I think we can put it to rest)

You're right in that we can put this to rest because you keep missing where I've negated this "point" perfectly every time you try to bring it up. [b]I CAN NOT BAN PEOPLE. THIS WHITEHARTMAN FUCC OPENLY ADMITTED TO BEING ON HERE UNDERAGE. I'm not sure how I can be any clearer.

-You have yet to prove to me how you're so much better than the rest of us. Usually people with that kind of attitude get the red square up top. I'm not sure how you made it this far, I guess you've hid it very well. Or thats saying something about IA.

I have nothing to prove to you. You say the same the same thing that everyone else that gets into it with me says. And because I haven't got the red square ought to tell you something. I'm not even close to what your ASSUMPTIONS of me are.

-You come off as a major douche as a result of the above point.

This gets automatically vetoed since it is a "result" of the above "point" since the above "point" was shown invalid.

The overall gist of this is that you're doing nothing new by trying your (lolol) wits against mine. It's been attempted on many occasions. I'll let you in on why I've never been "put to rest." I don't get into debates about things of which I know nothing. That would make me look the fool. This is why you look the fool among the regular IA members. They know who I am on the real. Not the online me. The person you are trying to best is someone that you're making ASSUMPTIONS about. Commenting on lack of education and wit and all. This is why you're whole "argument (as you call it)" is baseless. And people actually knowing me is how I was able to make it this far. So marinate on that for a second before you reply again. Remember that you're basing this rift with me solely on me helping get Gilligan banned and not anyone else. Remember also that Gilligan made several posts bragging that he was on here underage and that he was still here. You should be able to see this and we can move on. I'd rather move on than participate in this as you're not a bad dude. Later, QD.

[JBizzlebone]

This isn't an argument. An argument consists of two disagreeing sides with a valid point made on both. You're missing out.



You're right in that we can put this to rest because you keep missing where I've negated this "point" perfectly every time you try to bring it up. [b]I CAN NOT BAN PEOPLE. THIS WHITEHARTMAN FUCC OPENLY ADMITTED TO BEING ON HERE UNDERAGE. I'm not sure how I can be any clearer.



I have nothing to prove to you. You say the same the same thing that everyone else that gets into it with me says. And because I haven't got the red square ought to tell you something. I'm not even close to what your ASSUMPTIONS of me are.



This gets automatically vetoed since it is a "result" of the above "point" since the above "point" was shown invalid.

The overall gist of this is that you're doing nothing new by trying your (lolol) wits against mine. It's been attempted on many occasions. I'll let you in on why I've never been "put to rest." I don't get into debates about things of which I know nothing. That would make me look the fool. This is why you look the fool among the regular IA members. They know who I am on the real. Not the online me. The person you are trying to best is someone that you're making ASSUMPTIONS about. Commenting on lack of education and wit and all. This is why you're whole "argument (as you call it)" is baseless. And people actually knowing me is how I was able to make it this far. So marinate on that for a second before you reply again. Remember that you're basing this rift with me solely on me helping get Gilligan banned and not anyone else. Remember also that Gilligan made several posts bragging that he was on here underage and that he was still here. You should be able to see this and we can move on. I'd rather move on than participate in this as you're not a bad dude. Later, QD.

It's funny that you say that because you seem to be doing the same to me. Saying we're not on the same pedastal and how you're so much more intelligent than I am. I'm simply trying to defend myself on that point and I don't think people would look at me as a fool because of it. I, also, don't get into arguments I know nothing about which is why I wanted to put the whitemanhart thing to rest. People with a "holier than thou" attitude just rub off on me the wrong way. Maybe you're not like that in person, but it's hard to tell through your insults and so-called "witty" posts. It seems like you're trying to hide the person you really are under all the "I'm smarter than you" pretenses.

[quickdodge®]

I, also, don't get into arguments I know nothing about

You did here.

which is why I wanted to put the whitemanhart thing to rest.

Ok, cool. We can drop it and move on.

People with a "holier than thou" attitude just rub off on me the wrong way. Maybe you're not like that in person, but it's hard to tell through your insults and so-called "witty" posts. It seems like you're trying to hide the person you really are under all the "I'm smarter than you" pretenses.

You'd be an idiot to really believe that I think that of myself. I just post it to see what reactions I get. And we've already discussed why (only) you don't find my posts "witty." And trust on this last note: I'm hiding nothing in the intelligence department. There are things that can be hidden through the Web, but an idiot will not be able to consistently type the way I do with proper word usage, sentence structure and spelling. I'm as smart as I say I am and portray myself. That part isn't an E-personality.

We ready for a truce? Later, QD.