looks good,but screams RX-8 as u said....if they get it under 2800 pounds it will be sick
looks good,but screams RX-8 as u said....if they get it under 2800 pounds it will be sick
I got $20 on the curb weight being right around 3200-3500Originally Posted by HypnoToad
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10
i drive my 92 civic because is a gas saver but i'm real faithful to my 3 rx7. 87 turbo 2, 88 gxl , 84 gs . the Rx8 they look ok but the engine sucks you can do nothing in Puerto Rico what they do they buy an Rx8 and swap the engine for a turbo 2 or a b20 cosmo
i just think thats from the lack of knowledge on the renesis... not from worthlessness. The renesis being a na rotary makes alot more power than the old na 13b.
13b can make aloooottt of hp if you know how to do a good set up last time i went back home they had 13b engines doing 6sec
13b has been whored out....its very well known..i think all the secrets have been found. Time to move on to the renesis...
both of them have the same funtions rotor housings but theres no one out there that has and rx8 that can go lower than 11sec, everybody know the basic secrets of a 13b but theres to many secrets that people dont know and there way to many to list that you wont find on the internet or a book rx8 engine is good but not for racing maybe in the future13b has been whored out....its very well known..i think all the secrets have been found. Time to move on to the renesis...
Last edited by EL_DISTROYEL; 05-06-2008 at 04:34 PM.
A typical NA 2.4L = ~ 200hp.
Renesis NA 1.3L = 178 hp compared to 125 hp from the 1991 13b,
that's 40% increase from no displacement gain. That's genius!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
