so... how about this for all you nissan lovers. sad to say but heres the third nissan gtr that i know about to crash bad
http://www.wreckedexotics.com/newpho...0315_001.shtml
so... how about this for all you nissan lovers. sad to say but heres the third nissan gtr that i know about to crash bad
http://www.wreckedexotics.com/newpho...0315_001.shtml
either these cars suck or ppl just can drive
92 Lx 466, 11.8 @ 111 (Daily Driver)
98 sunfire GT (terrible gas mileage)
i believe someone ran into him...
They suck, compared to the other GT-R models... Oh and most people can't drive....lolOriginally Posted by bouncy!
"Damn, Its Tyler"RaceReadyDevelopments
hard to comprehend?Originally Posted by -SkInNy-
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Huh...? Ever looked at the road tests of that car? The numbers are truly amazing...Originally Posted by AnthonyF
YES IT IS OVERRATEDOriginally Posted by AnthonyF
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Looks like he hit a pole, ha! another one!
I agree, except for the "Sorry" part. Plus, it looks better like this then from the factory.Originally Posted by AnthonyF
There.Originally Posted by ironchef
81911 I love ya but I really don't know how you can call a car that outperforms cars that cost up to 4 times as much as it overrated. And can be comfortably daily driven.
Last edited by koukis14; 04-25-2008 at 12:00 AM. Reason: I am the lizard king!
Originally Posted by ironchef
I was trying not to attack his fan boysness.......pretty much because I am a Nissan fanboy
sorry, i posted this the day it happened.
Nope, I personally just dislike it.Originally Posted by ironchef
Kouki, Iyou too. I like a manual, a sexy car and less computer shiit.
I agree, it's faster then most Porsches. That's fine. The Turbo has been out for a few years, no problem.
and half the style. Not to most on here though.Originally Posted by ironchef
I agree it should be an option.Originally Posted by 81911SC
It's also a big deal to most.Originally Posted by ironchef
Porsche still offers a manual, like a company should.Originally Posted by koukis14
![]()
Exactly. lolol Just myOriginally Posted by ironchef
not like it matters.
![]()
Originally Posted by AnthonyF
![]()
weak civic
I bet if you had a GTR, and I had a GT2, I would beat you. Bolt a few goodies on the Porsche and be even faster. PLUS Porsche or Nissan...hmmm...what kind of question is that? I would take a dead stock 914 over a GTROriginally Posted by ironchef
If you want a GTR right NOW I bet it will cost more then 72kOriginally Posted by ironchef
Well no ****, GT-R was designed to compete with the 911 Turbo. GT2 is lighter, faster, and more powerful compared to the 911 turbo.Originally Posted by simontibbett
As far as bolting on a few goodies, thats a useless argument. Do the same thing to the GT-R and it also will be faster, what a surprise.
But for almost 20k cheaper you can get a new M5 and spank the GTR in every aspect.... HMMMMMM... i still think the GTR is overpricedOriginally Posted by ironchef
PIC TOO BIG
lol...I'm sure for the money, GT-R outclasses every car there is.
It's the mark ups on these that makes it seems overrated. People needs to understand that the GT-R itself IS NOT overpriced. It's the Freaking US dealers. People need to get their facts right.
lol, and where the hell do people see that the M5 spanks the GT-R and GT3? lol....Sorry, be the only cars that's in the closest price range and has potentials to outperform the GT-R are the Porsche GTs.
Btw, independent tests proved that BMW's new GODLY M3 performed POORLY against the GT-R. But it's also costs MORE than the GT-R.
Again, when comparing, people needs to compare apples to apples. I'm no Nissan Fan Boy. I'm just an unbiased car enthusiasts. I speaks the same for any other cars that I know of.
m5 over the GTR any day imo
M5...no.
And sorry not GT2 I mean 911 turbo.