V6 NA vs. I-4 TurboQuote:
Originally Posted by Fume
Come on man, compare apples to apples. lol
Printable View
V6 NA vs. I-4 TurboQuote:
Originally Posted by Fume
Come on man, compare apples to apples. lol
You can't argue that, you have turbos.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fume
Now if we are talking Porsche. Flat Six with 415 HP N/A :love:
this thread delivers
still 4 cylinders :)
You're an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fume
:idb: tonight?Quote:
Originally Posted by 81911SC
Nissan Sean
Last Activity: Today 05:14 PM
Viewing Thread Nissan R35 GT-R Based Crossover SUV? ~ Oh please No :~( @ 05:14 PM
lol sean you are retarded, the 350z is Fugly.
The subaru places function over form, it is rally inspired. Subarus define what looks good and what does not, when the 04 and 06 subarus came out people thought they were ugly, now people think they look nice. And I'm willing to put money on the new STI catching on
Subi looks better, drives better, turns better, fits more people in it better... handles better, drives faster, AWD, and did I mention faster?
Wait I think it gets better gas mileage too...
Oh and 300hp out of a v6 is not something you can really brag about....(btw you have 287 stock brand new)
The s2000 gets 240 out of a 2.4 I4, and the upcomming GTR gets ~480
Your 2 door 350z is 3400 pounds, 4 door STI weighs 3200 pounds.
Your car has 287 Hp and the STI has 300
I hope you are smart enough to do the math...
sti over 350z anyday
still has turbo..........why are you in tis stupid argument anyway. and you neg repped me lol. silly subie owners you guys are a special group thats for sure. hell you could pull up to a lambo and youd still say your car is faster, and why do you all have to insist that you believe that your cars are asthetically pleasing. they look ricey as hell even stock, huge wing, horrible looking head and tail lights, come on lets just agree to disagree. the important thing is that we both love the cars we own, and we chose them for our own reasons.
oh and new 07 z has 307 hp. and 7500 redline, not bad for a sixer. new subie= ford focus, and it lost to the new evo in every comparison test. :D
I havn't neg bombed you yet... in two pm i told you explain your self and you pussed out after telling me to eat c0ck.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
Time is running out "Sean"
I would take an STI over a 350 any day..
Now we can ask Will speedmonkey, he has one of each... Maybe he can give us more insight....
sti>350
350's are nice but......ehhhh
Nissan Sean
Last Activity: Today 05:23 PM
Modifying Post @ 05:23 PM
Just to play my card, I gotta admit that I'd probably get the 350Z instead of the STi. The STi, in my opinion, is a very ugly car. Has been since the bug-eyed Sedan and is still today with the new STi station wagon.
The 350Z is simply a sleeker looking machine. Screw the odd door handles. It's a minor detail when looking at the overall lines of the car. 300ish HP out of an N/A V6 isn't bad, despite what you turbo boys want to say. Hell, my Mustang has a V8 and makes 300HP and 320TQ. So what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
i told you to eat **** along time ago, what do i need to spell out for you.? ok ill explain myself here it goes: you directly insulted a nice car with an ignorant statemant. i retaliated by insulting you and it has come to what you see now. are you happy? please oh, please your holyness dont neg rep me......do it or dont do it, like i said i dont give a crap either way.
You know for some reason in the past few weeks ive started to like the current stang but mostly cause of the FR500C in the koni challange.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ran
Ran...have you driven an STI....i used to sell subarus and all these people come in and say "what's with the huge wing and scoops and such"
They drive , they buy it as if it was the easiest car deal ever.
Thanks Ran, needed somone to back me up here, getin attacked by these crazy subie owners. atleast somone here can interpret good styling and respect performance.
Hey "SEAN" read posts #16 and #19Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
I respect performance...that's why i got these subie keys in my hand :yes:
I have, and I've nothing against the STi performance-wise. I think it's got great power, handles fine, and is a fun drive. I just wouldn't buy one because I find them unattractive.Quote:
Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
I take all vehicles for what they're worth. The Subie may perform better, it may not. I don't know since I have no idea what the specifics are for either vehicle. All I know is that the 350Z has decent power for what it is and looks sleek IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
I see the comparison like this...
STi - Fat chick who is great in bed.
350Z - Fit chick who is average in bed.
Then again, that's just me. To each his own.
i never insulted he subies performace did i? no. i have driven one and they prefrom real well, on a fun factor though in my opinion(not to insult anyone) i like the z better. there both good cars. the end
Good answer ran... i applaud your use of rational to make that decision. You didn't even have to call anyone a c0ck to get your point across. :goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ran
well you know what i didnt read post #19 and now it changes things. non the less it wasnt funny. it was a poorly designed joke that i misinterpreted to be a harsh insult. my bad . thats about as far as i can go apology wise
so you admit your an idiot?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
even still though with the combination of the two threads.
i tally the IA people like this
350z - 2 - (one is the indecisiveness of ran)
STI - 7
To go along with that.....who remembers the 350z VS forester xt thread?
You can chalk me up to the 350Z. I'd buy it over the STi just because I think it looks better, is more sporty, and has respectable performance. :cheers:Quote:
Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
i did... 350z final score of 2Quote:
Originally Posted by Ran
1. people who open doors, unless you are Bo DukeQuote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
2. 300 hp woo hoo, look at the e46 m3
3. it still takes up space/stupid
4. well in that case he thinks the 06's are ulgy too
i think the final score isnt fair(a little baised, more suby guys in the thread).lol but im not gonna say i was an idot just a little overzealous. you gotta realize us 350z guys are sensitive and the only people who ever say bad things about our cars always seem to be you suby guys. its a rivalry thing i guess. please dont bring up the forester vs z thread, thats a very bad idea.
so many haters in this thread..... its almost funny, oh and the e46m3 is an awesome machine too. so are porche's with there flat sixes pushing out crazy numbers. but the price difference is big too.
EVERYONE LOOK HERE!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
http://www.importatlanta.com/forums/...d=129226&stc=1
Quote:
Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
thats just not nice.
id rather have a str8 jeep cherokee over that ugly thing.lol just kidding
ill take a s2k over a 350 anyday, lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
not for a 2001-03
this man knows what a proper RWD car is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky.
Top Gear ownership survey
Year..... Best Ranked..... Worst ranked
2003..... Jaguar XJ.......... Volkswagen Sharan
2004..... Honda S2000..... Mercedes M-Class
2005..... Honda S2000..... Peugeot 807
2006..... Honda S2000..... Peugeot 807
if you can fit in a damn s2k. EJ23RUN your the one who keeps being antagonistic. i test drove an s2k no thanks, i like torque .
Like torque?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
"Sean" im antagonistic but you are simply ignorant. The s2k was never ever meant to be a torque machine. It was meant to replicate the market held by the miata and held true the tradition set by the s800 and s600 sportscar of the 60's.
You know sean, the ones that in race trim reved to 11.500k ....right sean?
The s2k is a handling car with # 1 purpose is feedback of the road and proper cornering.....Things a z fall way short on.
If you dont understand something and diss it.... its called ignorants sean.
And remember i dont even own an s2k.
why do you keep using my name huh? its a little creepy, but yeah if the s2k is great why then on road courses the z beats it (stock for stock) ? answer me that. i can find a video in japan if i need to prove it. the s2k is a great handling car, but i like torque and hp. why do we keep arguing anyway. and now your the one insulting me? i dont really care which is the fastest or what cars is better, i bought my car because i loved the styling, the performance, and the fun factor. i have no plans to go race anybody. i dont street race, and i dont track my car, so who cares? there will always be better cars, no doubt, but i bout the one right for me and i absolutley love it. if that makes me ignorant than so be it. the Z is the best car for me that i can afford. otherwise i would have a porsche, but seeing how thats out of the question i bought the z. its a fun car that looks good and goes as fast as i need it to go. and like they say, "ignorance is bliss" so i must be one happy muther fukcer according to you.
oh and the word "ignorance" isnt spelled with a "t" or an "s" smart guy:goodjob:
He owned himself from the start and just kept on digging his grave.Quote:
Originally Posted by JITB
Sean, sean, sean..... :no:Quote:
Originally Posted by Nissan Sean
you just dont get it.
Why have torque and hp if you don't race or track your car?
Shouldn't you be driving a "sexy" Prius?
Are you like that guy in high school that daddy buys him a viper and he thinks he's the **** when he has zero understanding of the car?
only thing the sti wins is an ugliest car award ,which i'll personally hand the trophy for.