Transformation of my new GSR

[allmotoronly]

Who the fuck do you think you are bitch? You think that because a GSR is more expensive than a CRX that its automatically better? I tell you what, how much did you spend for that pile of shit? I bet I have less money in my CRX and it will run circles around that stock garbage in any competition you wanna throw at it.

BTW: I have that and another project car that is even older, and I drive a significantly newer SUV daily. Fuck you, and fuck your car. Go wrap it around a tree you ignorant fuck.

No I said GSR's have more stock potential than a CRX. I guess you forgot to read the whole first page of this thread. I never said it was better because it cost more. I am not the ignorant one here. You obviously missed the whole point of this arguement. My point was that my Car is newer, has way less miles, and has better technology (stock) than a Stock CRX had. How exactly is my car a pile of shit? It is a 2 owner car, has 80k miles, has never been modded, never been wrecked, and never been abused. I paid $6k for it. Find me a 97 GSR that is a one owner car, never modded or anything in the condition of my car... Thats right, its damn near impossible. I searched for months and finally found this one in pennsylvania.

[BTLFED]

No I said GSR's have more stock potential than a CRX. I guess you forgot to read the whole first page of this thread. I never said it was better because it cost more. I am not the ignorant one here. You obviously missed the whole point of this arguement. My point was that my Car is newer, has way less miles, and has better technology (stock) than a Stock CRX had. How exactly is my car a pile of shit? It is a 2 owner car, has 80k miles, has never been modded, never been wrecked, and never been abused. I paid $6k for it. Find me a 97 GSR that is a one owner car, never modded or anything in the condition of my car... Thats right, its damn near impossible. I searched for months and finally found this one in pennsylvania.

The whole point of this thread is you talking shit about something you know nothing about. You are also basing the weight factor on a 91 Si which IS the heavest of the bodystyle. Mine is an 88 which is the lightest, and has suspension based on the Integra Type R. That makes it faster than a 91 Si because it is lighter and handle just as well if not better than your GSR. How's your weight distribution on that thing? Mine is 52/48 front to rear. And you are right, the car isn't as much a pile of shit as the idiot driving it.

And FYI-your -1 means nothing compared to the -20 I gave you, stupid.

[allmotoronly]

The whole point of this thread is you talking shit about something you know nothing about. You are also basing the weight factor on a 91 Si which IS the heavest of the bodystyle. Mine is an 88 which is the lightest, and has suspension based on the Integra Type R. That makes it faster than a 91 Si because it is lighter and handle just as well if not better than your GSR. How's your weight distribution on that thing? Mine is 52/48 front to rear. And you are right, the car isn't as much a pile of shit as the idiot driving it.

And FYI-your -1 means nothing compared to the -20 I gave you, stupid.

whatever man... don't get so defensive. I dont know why you say I am an idiot... I have built many honda's. I know my shit. this arguement was about a CRX Si, not a CRX HF or any others. I know the HF is lighter, but green91 and I were comparing GSR's with CRX Si's IN STOCK FORM. The 8 valve D15B6 in the HF only had like 70hp... the CRX LX/DX (mostly known as just a plain CRX) had 92 hp (D15B2), and the CRX Si had 108 hp (D16A6). The HF in 88 weighed about 1820 lbs, which put it at 25.98 lbs per HP STOCK. the LX/DX (which were the same, but badged differently depending on whether it was in the US or canada) weighed about 1920lbs, and had a power to weight ratio of 20.89lbs per hp. The lightest CRX ever was the 85-86 or 87 (I cant rember exactly), which weighed about 1710 lbs.. The heaviest was the 91 Si, which weighed about 2230lbs or so.

My point is that yes your car may be lighter, but in stock form it was not that fast. In 88, the cars were lighter than in later years, but it really doesnt matter since in STOCK FORM (which the whole arguement has been about) the HF and DX were underpowered. IF you have a B16A swap, (according to the specs of the JDM CrX SiR dohc VTEC) the weight would be 2260, minus the 200lb difference between the Si trim and the HF trim, and you would weigh in at about 2060 lbs. that puts the power to weight at 12.75 lbs per Hp, which would be very quick, much faster than a stock GSR. But the arguement here is stock to stock, and last time I checked, the CRX SiR was never offered here.

[BTLFED]

whatever man... don't get so defensive. I dont know why you say I am an idiot... I have built many honda's. I know my shit. this arguement was about a CRX Si, not a CRX HF or any others. I know the HF is lighter, but green91 and I were comparing GSR's with CRX Si's IN STOCK FORM. The 8 valve D15B6 in the HF only had like 70hp... the CRX LX/DX (mostly known as just a plain CRX) had 92 hp (D15B2), and the CRX Si had 108 hp (D16A6). The HF in 88 weighed about 1820 lbs, which put it at 25.98 lbs per HP STOCK. the LX/DX (which were the same, but badged differently depending on whether it was in the US or canada) weighed about 1920lbs, and had a power to weight ratio of 20.89lbs per hp. The lightest CRX ever was the 85-86 or 87 (I cant rember exactly), which weighed about 1710 lbs.. The heaviest was the 91 Si, which weighed about 2230lbs or so.

My point is that yes your car may be lighter, but in stock form it was not that fast. In 88, the cars were lighter than in later years, but it really doesnt matter since in STOCK FORM (which the whole arguement has been about) the HF and DX were underpowered. IF you have a B16A swap, (according to the specs of the JDM CrX SiR dohc VTEC) the weight would be 2260, minus the 200lb difference between the Si trim and the HF trim, and you would weigh in at about 2060 lbs. that puts the power to weight at 12.75 lbs per Hp, which would be very quick, much faster than a stock GSR. But the arguement here is stock to stock, and last time I checked, the CRX SiR was never offered here.

Who said I had an HF? Just quit. You are googling yourself to death, and failing to impress me. How long have you been doing this?

[allmotoronly]

Who said I had an HF? Just quit. You are googling yourself to death, and failing to impress me. How long have you been doing this?

I'm not googling anything... You said that the 88 was the lightest, which is not true unless it is the HF. Back your side up with some numbers.

[BTLFED]

I'm not googling anything... You said that the 88 was the lightest, which is not true unless it is the HF. Back your side up with some numbers.

Oh yeah, you are coming up with those numbers off the top of your head.

Whatever, you are full of shit, and everyone knows you are full of shit. Congratulations.

[allmotoronly]

Oh yeah, you are coming up with those numbers off the top of your head.

Whatever, you are full of shit, and everyone knows you are full of shit. Congratulations.

I have a list of specs for different honda's...