I dont see how the govt should be able to regulate what a person puts in their own body.
yes
no
dont give a shit
I dont see how the govt should be able to regulate what a person puts in their own body.
i say legalize it. weed was made illegal only after prohibition because the gov didnt want people smoking insted of drinking, and smoking hasnt kill a single person in over 2000 years of cultivation. also mayor luguardia (not spelled right) of new york had the only real test on pot done and found that when not abused it had no negitive effects on the human body. (abuse meaning getting blitzed out of your skull all day every day.)
i rmr someone looked it up and to OD from it you would have like smoke 10-20 pounds in 15 mins
I don't think for a second that the use of marijuana would go down if it were legalized. People are getting past the whole stage of "Oh, what a thrill because it's illegal." It's more likely that people smoke because it makes them feel better, either physically or mentally. It is most definitely a gateway drug. People like the high. Thereafter seeking out an even better high from another substance.
Do I think it should be legalized? Hell no. Too much shit can go down during deals and I'm more than happy knowing that I'm not surrounded by that bullshit. I'm tired of being out driving and almost getting nailed by some dumbass hotboxing his ride. It's just as bad as drinking and there are laws involved with that as well.
2001 Honda Prelude Base model
http://www.cardomain.com/id/twkg2001
Originally Posted by Prince NISMO
I used to smoke everyday and i dont think it shoudl be legal only because i mean yeah its weed and its not as bad as other drugs but if u really think about look what tabacco companys did to cigarettes they put all kinds of shit in them...one Marijuana is not an addictive drugs you get tobacco companies out there making weed cigarettes or sumthign you know their just gonna put more shit in their once you got people addicted to weed it just creates more problems also weed really does lead to other drugs most time i mean people get tired of smokign and want to try somethign new wether that be coke, ice,acid,x etc it just makes thigns worse and honestly cops are only really looking for the higher up people who are pushing pounds i know here in Gwinnett county you get pulled over with a little bit of green on you n a pipe most fot he time they arent gonna take u to jail they're just gonna take your shit and smash your pipe u just have to be hoenst about i cant tell you how manyt iem i've been blazed out of my mind and have told the truth and have had weed on me n pipes and the cops let me go with a warning for being hoenst like i said they are looking for worse drugs and also how many of us have been to concerts? just about everyone people smoke at concerts all the time and the cops dotn give a shit i mean take Weezer last year people were smoking right in front of cops and they didnt do shit just mysorry for spelling mistakes
It dosnt matter legal or not Im going to still smoke to get intouch with my inner feelings LOL
Last edited by toonz116; 09-05-2006 at 11:56 PM.
hell yeah just think about the commercials they'll make for iit that shit will be funny as hell, b/c they are going to have to advertise to sell so just think of the stupid shit they're going to come up with, i mean we already got stupid commercials now just think of when they do that.
If everyone were to smoke BobMarley this world would be a better place im not talking about getting stupid high im talking about high enough where you will still be able to handle your business
I dont smoke pot, and it should be legal becuase (even) though its not. People will still smoke pot all thier life what difference does it make
alcohol is legal, and it impairs your ability to function more than the effects of marijuana.
also, IMO the buying/selling of it would benefit out economy...
The reason they will not legalize it is they have no way of measuring how much you have had instantly like BAC. It is already a billion dollar industry for the Gov't. They make money form not only the fines but when they confincate the good and then resell it the the highest bidder overseas. Just like weapons the United States the Largest Drug and weapons dealer in the world.
i could have never said it better.
Wow!!! Some of you need to KEEP smoking whatever it is you're smoking and remember NOT to reproduce........some of yall are total malinformed idiots of the first degree.
IF you are going to defend ANYTHING, please do some half intelligent research. Smoking a blunt or a bowl with your boys on your back porch IS NOT research. Listening to your half lit bud that just did that bowl wit ya is also NOT research.
How is the gov't or anyone going to regulate it?
How are they going to modify it's use, i.e. how are you going to tell if someone is over the "limit"?
How are you going to determine what that "limit" is?
How are you going to tax it if it will suddenly become legal for people to sell it on the street?
How are you going to monitor production?
How are you going to regulate what one "farmer" puts onto his crop vs the other?
Some of you need to seriously read up on what a drug is and what it can and does to someone's body both physically and mentally. EVERY drug has a side effect. EVERY drug will diminish your ability to do certain things. Some people can function at .10 BAC while others are blatto at .05 BAC, eventhough one is "legal" and the other is not.
People will always do drugs that want to do drugs. It may be that marijuana is not the worst drug out there, but it is a drug. It affects the body just like any other substance. But just because it doesn't affect the body as violently as some other drugs don't make it out to be like it's candy. It's not. Not all pot is the same, trust me I KNOW.
Bottomline is that is not an easy answer to this. On one hand marijuana has shown some GOOD side effects, so it does have some positive uses. On the other hand you are opening up a pandorah's box by allowing one drug to be legal while keeping the others illegal. Who's to say that someone doesn't come along and demand that coke or heroin be made legal too?
We are being too simple minded if we think that there's one answer to this question. It's not that simple. There are lots of variables to think about.
I say go for it
Legalized bud would more than likely get toned down a bit which would mean more people would find ways to make it stronger. Then with it being legal, they wouldn't be so undercover to do testing and grow stronger strands!
I'm down for legalization.........
hahahahaha
Bballjamal
whose tha chick with her tittays out on your sig? interesting :boobies:
from what he made a thread about, it was some what a forein exchange friend from thai?
that was his gift, from her before she left back, also got some :boobies: :idb: :idb:
Not true.
There are ways for cops to test on location, just as drinking tests (lift one leg, taking so many steps in a line, etc.). I have personally been put through some of them.
Remember, the roadside test is only to determine reasonable doubt to detain and further test. None of the roadside tests are admisable in court, but the test you take when you are brought in is. They can easily test for MJ then.
They do issue DUI's for being high also, one of my boys got one.
And as far as it being a billion dollar industry for the gov't, they also spend billions on the enforcement of the laws.
And last, of course America is the largest drug and weapons dealer, we are also the richest by far. We are the largest dealer of many other things also.
I still say we should legalize it, and tax it.
Spend the tax money on education of drugs and clinics to help those that want to get away from it.
It's one of the few herbal medicines that actually work. Given a choice between Benadryl, Ambien, or marijuana for my sleep problems, marijuana hands down (I don't smoke it due to the possible legal issues). Another issue is even w/ insurance Ambien has a $50 copay, the drug company is going to get paid so long as their drug has a market. Marijuana seriously competes with a lot of drug catagories. Another reason marijuana remains illegal is it is so heavily associated with the counter colture movment in the 60's 70', wether or not it had any direct effect on the magnitude of it, the governmet would rather err on the side of caution as far as risking that marijuana could be a scocial catalyst. It could go on and on, tax dollars, criminalize citizens, medical, ect. So everyone who said it should stay illegal, go fix yourself another drink and think it over again.
Field sobriety tests is one thing, detection is another.
Exactly HOW are they going to determine that?Remember, the roadside test is only to determine reasonable doubt to detain and further test. None of the roadside tests are admisable in court, but the test you take when you are brought in is. They can easily test for MJ then.
The amount of THC in your body?
Did you know that THC remains in your body, depending on the users dosage, for up to a month? So, how are they going to be able to prove that THC detected today is not remnants of toking up yesterday or a week ago?
THC metabolizes into your fat cells and is stored there. That is how people get "violated" for using while out of jail on probation or parole. Tests show they used, not how much. How much happens to be the only determining factor in sobriety. You can smoke a J today and the "high" be over in a few hours. How does that make you guilty of a DUI a week from now? It doesn't. But if you use THC measurements and equipment that the police would likely use, it only shows that you smoked....not when nor how much.
So again, HOW are you going to determine who is and isn't "under the influence" in the field? Police will not be able to take the amount of time nor use the very expensive equipment needed to accurately determine someone's current THC content.
How'd they test him for being under the influence of anything but alcohol?They do issue DUI's for being high also, one of my boys got one.
Your boy probably admitted to doing the drug and thereby given the admission of guilt can and does get charged. As explained above, a pee test will only determine if he smoked MJ, not how much nor when.
lmao! Yea it was a friend that was visiting from thailand! She lived here in atlanta most of her life but moved to thai about 3yrs ago. She came back for a couple weeks and we jumped off pretty good from the last time we knew each other! Then Eg2 finishes off the rest well!
In a nutshell
There ARE field sobriety test that determine recent use of MJ. As I said I have been subjected to a few. The one I remember is where they shined a light in my and told me to look in the other direction, only turning my eyes. I dont have a clue what they were looking for. Look into it if you don't believe me, but I'm not making this up.
There are numerous ways to test for it, and a hair folicle test can determine the time frame it was used. A piss test is only used to determine use, there are others that yield more results.THC remains in your body, depending on the users dosage, for up to a month? So, how are they going to be able to prove that THC detected today is not remnants of toking up yesterday or a week ago?
I don't know what test they used in court, I wasn't there. But I do know that he didn't admit to it and tried to fight it. And again, a piss test is not the only method used to test for drug use.How'd they test him for being under the influence of anything but alcohol?
Your boy probably admitted to doing the drug and thereby given the admission of guilt can and does get charged. As explained above, a pee test will only determine if he smoked MJ, not how much nor when.
That test is administered as an initial sign of sobriety. If your pupils do not respond quickly enough to the light, you are thought to be under the influence of SOMETHING. That in itself is NOT enough evidence to convice anyone of anything. It gives reasonable cause for the officer to be allowed to go further. Just like field sobriety tests. You will not get convicted of DUI on a field sobriety test ALONE. That is why they bring you into the PD to test you AGAIN.
You would have lots of innocent people in jail, which would subsequently cause a huge backlog of lawsuits against the PD if you are going to use a folicle test for each and every one of the people suspected of DUI. It takes a long time for a hair folicle test to be done and results returned. What are you going to do with the person in the meantime? You can't put someone in jail w/o proof....proof doesn't come for a few weeks.....what are you going to do? Put that person in jail until then? What if it comes back negative for MJ? Wouldn't you be liable for damages and wrongful incarceration?There are numerous ways to test for it, and a hair folicle test can determine the time frame it was used. A piss test is only used to determine use, there are others that yield more results.
No PD will ever be stupid enough to open themselves up for lawsuit action like that. You have to have a method of testing that not only gives you accurate results, but it also gives you those results right then and there.
Again, do the research and find a testing method that fits those two criteria at the same time.
There are tests out there that determine if you've had THC lately, but the problem with DUI cases is that you have to prove that you have THC right now and at which amount. THC is stored in the body, even when you are not high and when you are not smoking right this minute. That's the big problem. The only tests accurate enough to determine how much and when take a lot of time and are expensive. Therefore, they are useless for officers in the field that have to make a determination of someone's sobriety right then and there. Unlike alcohol, THC is absorbed differently in the body. If it got into the blood stream and stayed there for a specific amount of time at a specific metabolic rate, fine. But it doesn't at all.I don't know what test they used in court, I wasn't there. But I do know that he didn't admit to it and tried to fight it. And again, a piss test is not the only method used to test for drug use.
So the very first case that went to court someone could simply say that they ingested some or even inhaled by accident as second hand smoke a week ago and that's how it showed up in their system. Both ways will show positive test results, but neither shows the person was under the influence when they were tested. So how could it hold up in court?
Again, I'm not supporting the ban of MJ all together because it does have positive effects unlike other drugs. But we also have to realize that its not as easy as just letting people do it whenever because it's not as easy as that either.
hell yeah it should be legal
ofcourse it should be... but should be forbidden to be smoked in certain places
by Jello Biafra
From I Blow Minds for a Living, recorded at Slim's, San Francisco, Nov 21, 1990
Does anybody out there know that for the first time in American history the U.S. Army was used in a war operation against the American people? Right near here, up in Humboldt County about 200 miles north of San Francisco right near a town called Shelter Cove, get this: three- to four-hundred American G.I.s dressed with automatic rifles and fully armed for battle, fanned out on maneuvers through the woods, backed up by a dozen Blackhawk attack helicopters. The mountain people up there were frightened out of their wits! They thought there was a war going on, especially the ones that had soldiers kicking in
And they actually did manage to find a few for the G.I.s to pull up, and then they had to fly in more from the government stash so the pile would look big enough when they lit the bonfire for the
If we're serious about saving the earth, saving the ozone and our freedom to go about saving the earth and the ozone, we should start by paying all those dirt-poor coca farmers in South America and out-of-work loggers in Fortuna and Eureka, and Midwest family farmers and rust-belt families too, to all get together and grow more pot!
Why? Get ready for this...! There's a book out called The Emperor Wears No Clothes. The author's name is Jack Herer. It's published by Queen of Clubs, and I think there's ads for it in High Times, or NORML, the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws, could direct you to a copy I'm sure, and in this book, among other places, it is written that before the 20th century, the marijuana plant provided almost all the world's paper, all the world's clothing and textiles, and almost all the world's rope.
According to none other than the U.S. Department of Agriculture you can make four times as much paper from one acre of hemp plants as you can from an acre of trees. And instead of chopping down all the redwoods in Humboldt County and turning Northern California, Oregon and Washington and Appalachia into the Sahara Desert, if you do it with hemp plants, you can just grow another crop a few months later and make more paper! At one-quarter the cost of making paper from wood pulp and only one-fifth the pollution. The ancient Romans knew this and grew it, Henry VIII made each farmer in old England grow their share, because they knew if you want the strongest natural fiber there is, you all have gotta do your part for the King and grow more pot!
And we did, too! Guess what Levi jeans were originally made out of? And guess what American flags used to be made out of? And guess what the early drafts of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution were written on? And if that's too un-Christian for you, guess what they made Guttenberg and King James Bibles out of? Guess what you can use to power a car? You can get at least four times as much cellulose to make gasohol or methanol from hemp stems as you can from a corn stalk. Which along with solar energy would be a great way to avoid dying for oil in Saudi Arabia.
In the 1920s and 1930s most American cars and farm machinery had the option of running on gas or on methanol; most racing cars still do run on methanol. And George Washington and Thomas Jefferson grew cannabis on their plantations and smoked it, too!
In the 1760s in the American colonies you could even be jailed for not growing pot! Because that was part of the key to becoming economically independent from Britain. Hemp was legal tender in the Americas, a substitute for money, from 1630 clear up to the early 1800s. And hemp seeds are a great source of protein, better than soybeans, and it's cheaper than soybeans, too. Or so says the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Marijuana is legal for medical use in 34 states used to treat glaucoma and pain caused by cancer, and you can digest more protein from a hemp seed than a soybean seed. It's even shown some signs at being able to combat herpes. And, guess what kind of a parachute Mr. Drug War Junta-Man himself George Bush used when he bailed out of that bomber in World War II?
Hemp was illegal by then, but farmers were briefly ordered to grow it again in this country for the war effort and all, and the U.S. Army had their own stash all along in the colonies in the Philippines.
So, how did everything get turned around so damn bad? Doesn't it strike you as a little dumb that we burn oil and choke ourselves and chop down all our trees and ruin innocent people's lives by branding them criminals and throwing them in jails, or sending them off to drug camps, or taking all their property and selling it before they're brought to trial? In the process, making crack and heroin cheaper and easier to get than pot? Why do we do this when we don't have to?
Meanwhile the Police Chief of L.A., Darryl Gates gets front page approval for telling a U.S. Senate committee that pot smokers should be shot on sight. Because smoking pot is treason because, after all, it's illegal.
Why was marijuana cracked down on? And why was it done so violently? Well ... Ready?!
In 1936 Popular Mechanics magazine hailed the invention of a new machine to process hemp, predicting that marijuana/hemp would once again become the world's largest cash crop. This did not at all sit well with people like Hearst Paper Manufacturing or Kimberly-Clark or other cutthroat multinationals who happen to have large timber holdings. It didn't sit to well with tobacco barons for obvious reasons, and it sure as hell didn't sit too well with old buddies DuPont. Hemp processing uses only one-fifth the chemicals need to process wood pulp, and DuPont had just patented a new wood pulp sulfide process, and DuPont's patented plastic fibers had just passed up hemp as the No. 2 fiber, next to cotton, and they wanted to keep it that way!
And the last thing the big drug companies wanted was to lose their share of the ever lucrative disease industry market, to more affordable medicine made from marijuana or other natural ingredients because, check this out, you can't own and make money off a patent for medicine in this country, unless the medicine has chemicals in it. If it's all natural ingredients, you can't patent it. Maybe that's why we don't have access to a cure for cancer or AIDS, or why the health food store I go to keeps getting harassed by federal authorities for selling herbal medicines.
Meanwhile, guess who owns Congress? So marijuana was outlawed in 1937 and they fanned the racism fires playing the racism card just like they do when they want to crack down on rock-and-roll or rap or hip hop or something like that. They said that smoking marijuana might cause you to fall under the influence of listening to jazz! I believe that it was even said on the floor of Congress that marijuana had to be banned because smoking it might make a black man look at a white woman twice. And let's not forget that U.S. Treasury Department funded documentary film, called, "Reefer Madness!" So marijuana was outlawed as devil weed in 1937. Only 53 years ago it was legal. Need I say more, on why our beloved fearless leaders go out of their way to censor our access to information so damn much? Can you imagine the mass outrage if this kind of stuff ever really got out? And people knew that this big drug problem that they keep reading about and hearing about is being caused by the government themselves? And people knew how easily each one of us individually could turn our ecological and human crisis around without resorting to Nazi bullshit like oil wars and drug wars by just saying no! to George Bush.
And if people knew that the very companies that provide us with such crucial conveniences as Kleenex, paper towels and junk mail, have systematically and brutally rearranged every single one of our lives so that we are literally wiping our ass with out own future?
not my words but heres i got it from my friends myspace and thought it was one of the most intresting arguments some one else might have brought up some of her points to but she really gives very good defined issues for it to be legalized.
I got an mp3 of the post above. PM me if you want it.
I never said a field sobriety test was enough to convict.
I was not reffering to the pupil test. That is a general test anyways, for many drugs. If you'd look back I my post, I said they made me look in the other direction while they shined the light. They were not shining the light at my pupils. They were looking for something else. I don't know what.
Not true. My company (BASF) has drug tested with the hair folicle test and gotten results the following day.You would have lots of innocent people in jail, which would subsequently cause a huge backlog of lawsuits against the PD if you are going to use a folicle test for each and every one of the people suspected of DUI. It takes a long time for a hair folicle test to be done and results returned.
You should do a little research on drug testing.
Hell, they can use a blood test to determine recent use also. If a blood test reveals THC, that means recent use. If it reveals Carboxy THC or any other MJ metabolite (which is what remains in your body for up to a month), it is not considered impairment.
http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=4940No PD will ever be stupid enough to open themselves up for lawsuit action like that. You have to have a method of testing that not only gives you accurate results, but it also gives you those results right then and there.
This is irrelevant. All they need to determine is suspicion to get them to the police station for further testing, which is done by field testing.There are tests out there that determine if you've had THC lately, but the problem with DUI cases is that you have to prove that you have THC right now and at which amount. THC is stored in the body, even when you are not high and when you are not smoking right this minute. That's the big problem. The only tests accurate enough to determine how much and when take a lot of time and are expensive. Therefore, they are useless for officers in the field that have to make a determination of someone's sobriety right then and there. Unlike alcohol, THC is absorbed differently in the body. If it got into the blood stream and stayed there for a specific amount of time at a specific metabolic rate, fine. But it doesn't at all.
A piss test can only detect MJ for so many days depending on the persons metabolism. If they were telling the truth, it would come up negative after a weeks time.So the very first case that went to court someone could simply say that they ingested some or even inhaled by accident as second hand smoke a week ago and that's how it showed up in their system. Both ways will show positive test results, but neither shows the person was under the influence when they were tested. So how could it hold up in court?
A blood test would reveal THC metabolites if he's telling the truth, which is not enough to convict in most states (but it is in some). If the test revealed actual THC, the he has not metabolized it yet which is proof of recent use.
As I have said, I have PERSONALLY seen someone convicted of this and I have provided a link of a similar case.
Don't believe me if you wish, I feel I have provided enough proof. Thanks for the discussion.
yes
:boobies:
Shooting mutha fuckahs in the face and gettin paid.
They made you look in a different direction but it was for the SAME reason.
You looked away in order for your pupils to look into the dark, then swing back into the light which causes NORMAL pupils to shrink quickly. If they stay dialated or "blown", it shows signs of impairment. It will NOT show WHAT caused the impairment.
Just like ANY field sobriety test shows you're impaired or not, but how do you think that shows it's MJ, cocaine, alcohol, prescription drugs, etc????? THAT is my point and you don't seem to get it. Field sobriety only gives them a reason to arrest you and take you IN. After that they have to prove RIGHT THEN AND THERE, not a day later, not a week later that you are RIGHT THEN AND THERE IMPAIRED. How do you suggest they do that? As has been explained 10 times already, MJ is absorbed differently than alcohol and therefore the mere presence of THC doesn't mean you JUST smoked it. You could've smoked it a week ago and still test positive.
That's possibly because they use it sparingly. #1 your company only has to prove that someone "uses", not always do they have to prove WHEN. So 99% of the time a simple positive means there is enough grounds for a company policy violation. #2 I'm willing to bet that they don't do 100 folicle tests a day, right? What do you think is going to happen when police departments all over the state start using the same people for folicle testing? Do you think the turn around time is still going to be a day? BTW, what are you going to do with someone UNTIL the results come back???Not true. My company (BASF) has drug tested with the hair folicle test and gotten results the following day.
I've challenged you to find an immidiate THC test available, and you've yet to answer that challenge. Seems like it's YOU that needs to do the research.You should do a little research on drug testing.
I was in Law Enforcement many years ago. I've DONE my research already. Proof is still proof today. You can't just hold someone on suspicion. You have to prove their guilt not only the day of the infraction but also in case it goes to court.
So what good does testing that shows use a month ago do for someone TODAY?????Hell, they can use a blood test to determine recent use also. If a blood test reveals THC, that means recent use. If it reveals Carboxy THC or any other MJ metabolite (which is what remains in your body for up to a month), it is not considered impairment.
"Recent use" is not good enough to convict anyone for driving TODAY. So what good does that test do towards a DUI????
What's irrelevant is what are you going to do when you do get someone back to the station if you can't show he is under impairment RIGHT NOW.....so all the field testing is for not.This is irrelevant. All they need to determine is suspicion to get them to the police station for further testing, which is done by field testing.
A piss test can only detect MJ for so many days depending on the persons metabolism. If they were telling the truth, it would come up negative after a weeks time.
What the hell does that have to do with the price of tea in China....
You're stuck on that "recent use" thing aren't you. Go search the GA Law books and find where ANY law allows for conviction on the assumption of "recent use" for DUI. It has to be at the time he/she is driving, not a week ago......A blood test would reveal THC metabolites if he's telling the truth, which is not enough to convict in most states (but it is in some). If the test revealed actual THC, the he has not metabolized it yet which is proof of recent use.
You've provided only proof for "recent use" tests which is like taking a birth control pill AFTER getting pregnant. What good does that do????Don't believe me if you wish, I feel I have provided enough proof. Thanks for the discussion.
Im gettin impaired right now
in amsterdam....well in all of holland really, they sell prerolled ....yeah...."joints" i guess. theyre called "stickies" which is a slang term for what theyre really called(which i dont know). But you can buy them already rolled and theyre amazing. they are mixed with tobacco and weed/hash and you can only buy them in "coffeeshops" - the ones with the neon signs. but the same general idea could be applied here and it could work out well....or i guess it could go to shit but i think theres a better change of success.
EF SQUAD FTMFW!!!!
I think selling it prerolled would suck, once the bud is broken up it begins to dry out, then it burns fast and becomes harsh on the throat and lungs. Now, prerolled blunts is another story.
Dude, for the last freakin time, THEY WEREN'T LOOKING IN MY PUPILS. I was there remember. IT WAS NOT THE DUMBASS PUPIL TEST.
HELLO. BLOOD TEST!!Let me explain this to you one more time since you seem to have reading comprehension issues. A blood test can show 3 things. no THC, THC, or THC metabolites. If the test shows THC metabolites then it means that the subject has use MJ but it has been metabolized and no time frame can be determined. If the test shows actual THC, that hasn't been metabolized, it means the subject has used within the last few hours depending on the subjects metabolism.I've challenged you to find an immidiate THC test available, and you've yet to answer that challenge. Seems like it's YOU that needs to do the research.
OK, since you obviously missed the link in my last post WHICH IS TO A CONVICTION FOR MJ DUI, I'll post it again.You're stuck on that "recent use" thing aren't you. Go search the GA Law books and find where ANY law allows for conviction on the assumption of "recent use" for DUI. It has to be at the time he/she is driving, not a week ago......
http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=4940
So, yet again, I have proven my statements and backed them up with links, which you have yet to prove any of your BS.
Since you can only reply with your opinion and nothing else, I'm not going to continue trying to explain this to you. Like I said before, do some research before you talk out of your ass.
prerolled with the really sticky stuff, you know what im talkin bout....fresh buds, roll it up in da blunt, then package it in air-tight plastic....
good to go! man....if only...
is it good weed or is it shitty since it's mixed with tobacco and hash?
i mean, is it a good high?
i like rolling my own shit
I bought a hooka today here in Iraq, its the shit and its authentic, Im pretty pumped to give it a toke, with only the finest tobacco obviously.
Premium Alaska bud.......
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
